ETLN.DE vs. XMLC.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ETLN.DE (L&G Europe ex UK Equity UCITS ETF) and XMLC.DE (L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETLN.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the Solactive Core Developed Markets Europe ex UK Large & Mid Cap, while XMLC.DE is a Water Equities fund tracking the Solactive Clean Water. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ETLN.DE returned 9.33%/yr vs 6.47%/yr for XMLC.DE. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ETLN.DE charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for XMLC.DE.

Performance

ETLN.DE vs. XMLC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Europe ex UK Equity UCITS ETF (ETLN.DE) and L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (XMLC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETLN.DE achieves a 7.75% return, which is significantly higher than XMLC.DE's 2.11% return.

ETLN.DE

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 1.13%
• YTD: 7.75%
• 6M: 9.98%
• 1Y: 16.15%
• 3Y*: 13.52%
• 5Y*: 9.33%
• 10Y*: —

XMLC.DE

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -3.12%
• YTD: 2.11%
• 6M: 1.40%
• 1Y: 7.18%
• 3Y*: 8.21%
• 5Y*: 6.47%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETLN.DE vs. XMLC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ETLN.DE L&G Europe ex UK Equity UCITS ETF	7.75%	20.59%	6.45%	18.04%	-12.23%	25.18%	1.20%	7.84%
XMLC.DE L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF	2.11%	3.88%	9.96%	17.08%	-12.64%	37.15%	7.97%	11.56%

Correlation

The correlation between ETLN.DE and XMLC.DE is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2019	0.72

The correlation between ETLN.DE and XMLC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ETLN.DE vs. XMLC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETLN.DE

ETLN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 35
ETLN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
ETLN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
ETLN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 34
ETLN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
ETLN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 39

XMLC.DE

XMLC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 17
XMLC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
XMLC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
XMLC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 16
XMLC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
XMLC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETLN.DE vs. XMLC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Europe ex UK Equity UCITS ETF (ETLN.DE) and L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (XMLC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ETLN.DE	XMLC.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.18	0.48	+0.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.76	0.77	+0.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.09	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.62	0.62	+1.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.98	1.60	+4.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ETLN.DE vs. XMLC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETLN.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is higher than the XMLC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETLN.DE and XMLC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ETLN.DE	XMLC.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.18	0.48	+0.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	0.41	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.69	0.56	+0.13

Drawdowns

ETLN.DE vs. XMLC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETLN.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.76%, roughly equal to the maximum XMLC.DE drawdown of -35.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETLN.DE and XMLC.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETLN.DE	XMLC.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.76%	-35.25%	+0.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.09%	-11.02%	+0.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.98%	-19.51%	+2.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.47%	-20.54%	-1.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.56%	-7.57%	+6.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.95%	-6.31%	+1.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.73%	4.28%	-1.55%

Volatility

ETLN.DE vs. XMLC.DE - Volatility Comparison

L&G Europe ex UK Equity UCITS ETF (ETLN.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.39% compared to L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (XMLC.DE) at 4.03%. This indicates that ETLN.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMLC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETLN.DE	XMLC.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.39%	4.03%	+0.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.28%	10.79%	+0.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.84%	14.11%	-0.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.14%	15.51%	-0.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.77%	18.66%	-1.89%

ETLN.DE vs. XMLC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETLN.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XMLC.DE's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

ETLN.DE vs. XMLC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETLN.DE nor XMLC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETLN.DE and XMLC.DE in my portfolio?

ETLN.DE and XMLC.DE have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ETLN.DE or XMLC.DE?

On fees, ETLN.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ETLN.DE or XMLC.DE?

ETLN.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for XMLC.DE.

What is the main difference between ETLN.DE and XMLC.DE?

ETLN.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while XMLC.DE is Water Equities. ETLN.DE tracks Solactive Core Developed Markets Europe ex UK Large & Mid Cap, while XMLC.DE tracks Solactive Clean Water. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for ETLN.DE and 0.49% for XMLC.DE.