ETLN.DE vs. CEMS.DE
ETLN.DE (L&G Europe ex UK Equity UCITS ETF) and CEMS.DE (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - ETLN.DE tracks the Solactive Core Developed Markets Europe ex UK Large & Mid Cap while CEMS.DE tracks the MSCI Europe Enhanced Value. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ETLN.DE returned 9.33%/yr vs 14.47%/yr for CEMS.DE. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ETLN.DE charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for CEMS.DE.
Performance
ETLN.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETLN.DE achieves a 7.75% return, which is significantly lower than CEMS.DE's 13.72% return.
ETLN.DE
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- 7.75%
- 6M
- 9.98%
- 1Y
- 16.15%
- 3Y*
- 13.52%
- 5Y*
- 9.33%
- 10Y*
- —
CEMS.DE
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 2.64%
- YTD
- 13.72%
- 6M
- 16.98%
- 1Y
- 32.08%
- 3Y*
- 21.63%
- 5Y*
- 14.47%
- 10Y*
- 10.71%
ETLN.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETLN.DE L&G Europe ex UK Equity UCITS ETF | 7.75% | 20.59% | 6.45% | 18.04% | -12.23% | 25.18% | 1.20% | 23.92% |
CEMS.DE iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF | 13.72% | 35.97% | 9.93% | 13.90% | -4.54% | 26.62% | -8.86% | 17.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETLN.DE and CEMS.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2019 | 0.86 |
The correlation between ETLN.DE and CEMS.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETLN.DE vs. CEMS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ETLN.DE
CEMS.DE
ETLN.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Europe ex UK Equity UCITS ETF (ETLN.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (CEMS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETLN.DE | CEMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.43 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 3.29 | -1.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.98 | 12.37 | -6.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETLN.DE | CEMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | 2.37 | -1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.94 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.49 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
ETLN.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETLN.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.76%, smaller than the maximum CEMS.DE drawdown of -40.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETLN.DE and CEMS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETLN.DE | CEMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.76% | -40.20% | +5.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.09% | -9.99% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.98% | -17.57% | +0.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.47% | -19.55% | -2.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.56% | -1.26% | -0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.95% | -7.49% | +2.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | 2.66% | +0.07% |
Volatility
ETLN.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G Europe ex UK Equity UCITS ETF (ETLN.DE) is 4.39%, while iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (CEMS.DE) has a volatility of 4.65%. This indicates that ETLN.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEMS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETLN.DE | CEMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.39% | 4.65% | -0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.28% | 11.17% | +0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.84% | 13.87% | -0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.14% | 15.23% | -0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.77% | 17.43% | -0.66% |
ETLN.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETLN.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than CEMS.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ETLN.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ETLN.DE nor CEMS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, ETLN.DE and CEMS.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, ETLN.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ETLN.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CEMS.DE.
ETLN.DE tracks Solactive Core Developed Markets Europe ex UK Large & Mid Cap, while CEMS.DE tracks MSCI Europe Enhanced Value. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for ETLN.DE and 0.25% for CEMS.DE.
Find the right allocation for ETLN.DE and CEMS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer