ETLK.DE vs. EMA5.DE

Last updated Jun 27, 2026

ETLK.DE (L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF) and EMA5.DE (L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETLK.DE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the Solactive Core Developed Markets Pacific ex Japan Large & Mid Cap, while EMA5.DE is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the J.P. Morgan ESG EMBI Global Diversified Short-Term Custom Maturity. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ETLK.DE returned 5.57%/yr vs 3.90%/yr for EMA5.DE. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ETLK.DE charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for EMA5.DE.

Performance

ETLK.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF (ETLK.DE) and L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMA5.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETLK.DE achieves a 8.90% return, which is significantly higher than EMA5.DE's 4.91% return.

ETLK.DE

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -0.13%
• YTD: 8.90%
• 6M: 8.98%
• 1Y: 14.92%
• 3Y*: 10.94%
• 5Y*: 5.57%
• 10Y*: —

EMA5.DE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.83%
• YTD: 4.91%
• 6M: 5.25%
• 1Y: 9.28%
• 3Y*: 6.96%
• 5Y*: 3.90%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETLK.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ETLK.DE L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF	8.90%	7.48%	11.53%	1.31%	-0.52%	11.62%	1.97%
EMA5.DE L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF	4.91%	-2.08%	14.60%	4.24%	-4.92%	8.07%	-0.83%

Correlation

The correlation between ETLK.DE and EMA5.DE is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.11
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2020	0.09

Return for Risk

ETLK.DE vs. EMA5.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETLK.DE

ETLK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 42
ETLK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
ETLK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
ETLK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 35
ETLK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
ETLK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 45

EMA5.DE

EMA5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 56
EMA5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
EMA5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
EMA5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 50
EMA5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
EMA5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETLK.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF (ETLK.DE) and L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMA5.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ETLK.DE	EMA5.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	1.48	-0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.82	2.18	-0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.28	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.49	3.25	-0.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.70	8.80	-2.10

ETLK.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETLK.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the EMA5.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETLK.DE and EMA5.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ETLK.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETLK.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.68%, which is greater than EMA5.DE's maximum drawdown of -10.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETLK.DE and EMA5.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETLK.DE	EMA5.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.68%	-10.01%	-26.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.97%	-2.87%	-3.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.91%	-10.01%	-9.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.91%	-10.01%	-9.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.44%	-0.46%	-1.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.72%	-3.35%	-2.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.22%	1.06%	+1.16%

Volatility

ETLK.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Volatility Comparison

L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF (ETLK.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.70% compared to L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMA5.DE) at 2.40%. This indicates that ETLK.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMA5.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETLK.DE	EMA5.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.70%	2.40%	+1.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.71%	4.82%	+4.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.33%	6.31%	+6.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.85%	7.12%	+7.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.17%	7.00%	+11.17%

ETLK.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETLK.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than EMA5.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ETLK.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Dividend Comparison

ETLK.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMA5.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.22%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EMA5.DE L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF	5.22%	6.10%	5.86%	4.63%	3.06%	1.19%
ETLK.DE L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETLK.DE and EMA5.DE in my portfolio?

ETLK.DE and EMA5.DE have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ETLK.DE or EMA5.DE?

On fees, ETLK.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ETLK.DE or EMA5.DE?

ETLK.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for EMA5.DE.

What is the main difference between ETLK.DE and EMA5.DE?

ETLK.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while EMA5.DE is Emerging Markets Bonds. ETLK.DE tracks Solactive Core Developed Markets Pacific ex Japan Large & Mid Cap, while EMA5.DE tracks J.P. Morgan ESG EMBI Global Diversified Short-Term Custom Maturity. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for ETLK.DE and 0.25% for EMA5.DE.