PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETLH.DE vs. XMLC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETLH.DE vs. XMLC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF (ETLH.DE) and L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (XMLC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETLH.DE achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly lower than XMLC.DE's 2.11% return.


ETLH.DE

1D
1.09%
1M
4.11%
YTD
0.49%
6M
1.45%
1Y
4.62%
3Y*
5.96%
5Y*
2.34%
10Y*

XMLC.DE

1D
0.01%
1M
-3.12%
YTD
2.11%
6M
1.40%
1Y
7.18%
3Y*
8.21%
5Y*
6.47%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETLH.DE vs. XMLC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ETLH.DE
L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF
0.49%-0.43%8.79%17.72%-16.87%27.97%30.38%7.37%
XMLC.DE
L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF
2.11%3.88%9.96%17.08%-12.64%37.15%7.97%11.56%

Correlation

The correlation between ETLH.DE and XMLC.DE is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2019

0.73

The correlation between ETLH.DE and XMLC.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETLH.DE vs. XMLC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETLH.DE
ETLH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
ETLH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETLH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETLH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
ETLH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETLH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

XMLC.DE
XMLC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
XMLC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMLC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMLC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
XMLC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMLC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETLH.DE vs. XMLC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF (ETLH.DE) and L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (XMLC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETLH.DEXMLC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.09

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

0.62

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.96

1.60

-0.64

ETLH.DE vs. XMLC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETLH.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the XMLC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETLH.DE and XMLC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETLH.DEXMLC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

0.48

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.41

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.56

-0.01

Drawdowns

ETLH.DE vs. XMLC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETLH.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.60%, smaller than the maximum XMLC.DE drawdown of -35.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETLH.DE and XMLC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETLH.DEXMLC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.60%

-35.25%

+7.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.61%

-11.02%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.70%

-19.51%

-6.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.37%

-20.54%

-5.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.50%

-7.57%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.28%

-6.31%

-1.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.89%

4.28%

+0.61%

Volatility

ETLH.DE vs. XMLC.DE - Volatility Comparison

L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF (ETLH.DE) and L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (XMLC.DE) have volatilities of 4.00% and 4.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETLH.DEXMLC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

4.03%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.62%

10.79%

-0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.85%

14.11%

+0.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.60%

15.51%

+1.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.49%

18.66%

-1.17%

ETLH.DE vs. XMLC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ETLH.DE and XMLC.DE have an expense ratio of 0.49%.


Dividends

ETLH.DE vs. XMLC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETLH.DE nor XMLC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ETLH.DE and XMLC.DE have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ETLH.DE and XMLC.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.

ETLH.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while XMLC.DE is Water Equities. ETLH.DE tracks Solactive eCommerce Logistics, while XMLC.DE tracks Solactive Clean Water.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETLH.DE and XMLC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer