PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETLH.DE vs. QUTM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETLH.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF (ETLH.DE) and VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETLH.DE achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly lower than QUTM.DE's 33.86% return.


ETLH.DE

1D
1.09%
1M
4.11%
YTD
0.49%
6M
1.45%
1Y
4.62%
3Y*
5.96%
5Y*
2.34%
10Y*

QUTM.DE

1D
-1.49%
1M
15.40%
YTD
33.86%
6M
29.52%
1Y
59.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETLH.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ETLH.DE and QUTM.DE is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2025

0.52

The correlation between ETLH.DE and QUTM.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETLH.DE vs. QUTM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETLH.DE
ETLH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
ETLH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETLH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETLH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
ETLH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETLH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

QUTM.DE
QUTM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
QUTM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUTM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUTM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
QUTM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUTM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETLH.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF (ETLH.DE) and VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETLH.DEQUTM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.32

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

2.48

-2.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.96

5.81

-4.86

ETLH.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETLH.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the QUTM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETLH.DE and QUTM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETLH.DEQUTM.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

1.95

-1.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

1.71

-1.15

Drawdowns

ETLH.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETLH.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.60%, which is greater than QUTM.DE's maximum drawdown of -23.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETLH.DE and QUTM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETLH.DEQUTM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.60%

-23.74%

-3.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.61%

-23.74%

+11.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.50%

-3.42%

-4.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.28%

-7.71%

-0.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.89%

10.15%

-5.26%

Volatility

ETLH.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF (ETLH.DE) is 4.00%, while VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE) has a volatility of 12.36%. This indicates that ETLH.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QUTM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETLH.DEQUTM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

12.36%

-8.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.62%

20.92%

-10.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.85%

30.14%

-15.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.60%

30.16%

-13.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.49%

30.16%

-12.67%

ETLH.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETLH.DE has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than QUTM.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETLH.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETLH.DE nor QUTM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ETLH.DE and QUTM.DE have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ETLH.DE is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ETLH.DE is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for QUTM.DE.

ETLH.DE tracks Solactive eCommerce Logistics, while QUTM.DE tracks MarketVector™ Global Quantum Leaders Total Return Net Index (MVQTMLTR). They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ETLH.DE and 0.55% for QUTM.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETLH.DE and QUTM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer