PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETLH.DE vs. IEVD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETLH.DE vs. IEVD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF (ETLH.DE) and iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IEVD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETLH.DE achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly lower than IEVD.DE's 58.66% return.


ETLH.DE

1D
1.09%
1M
4.94%
YTD
0.49%
6M
2.11%
1Y
4.70%
3Y*
5.96%
5Y*
2.34%
10Y*

IEVD.DE

1D
-1.86%
1M
20.81%
YTD
58.66%
6M
58.40%
1Y
88.90%
3Y*
23.68%
5Y*
13.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETLH.DE vs. IEVD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ETLH.DE
L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF
0.49%-0.43%8.79%17.72%-16.87%27.97%30.38%16.47%
IEVD.DE
iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
58.66%10.81%5.27%23.03%-23.20%26.64%20.44%6.55%

Correlation

The correlation between ETLH.DE and IEVD.DE is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2019

0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between ETLH.DE and IEVD.DE has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETLH.DE vs. IEVD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETLH.DE
ETLH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
ETLH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETLH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETLH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
ETLH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETLH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

IEVD.DE
IEVD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
IEVD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEVD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEVD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
IEVD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEVD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETLH.DE vs. IEVD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF (ETLH.DE) and iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IEVD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETLH.DEIEVD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.53

-0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

4.17

-3.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.96

9.74

-8.79

ETLH.DE vs. IEVD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETLH.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the IEVD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETLH.DE and IEVD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETLH.DEIEVD.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

2.71

-2.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.55

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.61

-0.05

Drawdowns

ETLH.DE vs. IEVD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETLH.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.60%, smaller than the maximum IEVD.DE drawdown of -42.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETLH.DE and IEVD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETLH.DEIEVD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.60%

-42.37%

+14.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.61%

-21.18%

+8.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.70%

-30.23%

+4.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.37%

-30.39%

+4.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.50%

-1.86%

-5.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.28%

-10.27%

+1.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.89%

9.09%

-4.20%

Volatility

ETLH.DE vs. IEVD.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G Ecommerce Logistics UCITS ETF (ETLH.DE) is 4.00%, while iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IEVD.DE) has a volatility of 11.17%. This indicates that ETLH.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEVD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETLH.DEIEVD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

11.17%

-7.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.62%

19.50%

-8.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.85%

32.58%

-17.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.60%

24.27%

-7.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.49%

25.27%

-7.78%

ETLH.DE vs. IEVD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETLH.DE has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IEVD.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETLH.DE vs. IEVD.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETLH.DE nor IEVD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ETLH.DE and IEVD.DE have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IEVD.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IEVD.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ETLH.DE.

ETLH.DE tracks Solactive eCommerce Logistics, while IEVD.DE tracks STOXX® Global Electric Vehicles & Driving Technology. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ETLH.DE and 0.40% for IEVD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETLH.DE and IEVD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer