ETLF.DE vs. XMLC.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ETLF.DE (L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF) and XMLC.DE (L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETLF.DE is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity, while XMLC.DE is a Water Equities fund tracking the Solactive Clean Water. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ETLF.DE returned 12.26%/yr vs 6.47%/yr for XMLC.DE. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ETLF.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for XMLC.DE.

Performance

ETLF.DE vs. XMLC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (ETLF.DE) and L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (XMLC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETLF.DE achieves a 23.78% return, which is significantly higher than XMLC.DE's 2.11% return.

ETLF.DE

• 1D: -1.48%
• 1M: -0.32%
• YTD: 23.78%
• 6M: 22.90%
• 1Y: 34.57%
• 3Y*: 12.51%
• 5Y*: 12.26%
• 10Y*: —

XMLC.DE

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -3.12%
• YTD: 2.11%
• 6M: 1.40%
• 1Y: 7.18%
• 3Y*: 8.21%
• 5Y*: 6.47%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETLF.DE vs. XMLC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ETLF.DE L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF	23.78%	4.67%	10.97%	-10.24%	21.51%	40.15%	-13.51%	2.54%
XMLC.DE L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF	2.11%	3.88%	9.96%	17.08%	-12.64%	37.15%	7.97%	11.56%

Correlation

The correlation between ETLF.DE and XMLC.DE is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.03
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2019	0.18

The correlation between ETLF.DE and XMLC.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ETLF.DE vs. XMLC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETLF.DE

ETLF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 58
ETLF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
ETLF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
ETLF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 56
ETLF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
ETLF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 52

XMLC.DE

XMLC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 17
XMLC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
XMLC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
XMLC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 16
XMLC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
XMLC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETLF.DE vs. XMLC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (ETLF.DE) and L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (XMLC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ETLF.DE	XMLC.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.86	0.48	+1.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.36	0.77	+1.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.09	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.96	0.62	+3.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.79	1.60	+7.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ETLF.DE vs. XMLC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETLF.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the XMLC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETLF.DE and XMLC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ETLF.DE	XMLC.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.86	0.48	+1.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	0.41	+0.30
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.56	-0.03

Drawdowns

ETLF.DE vs. XMLC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETLF.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.78%, smaller than the maximum XMLC.DE drawdown of -35.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETLF.DE and XMLC.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETLF.DE	XMLC.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.78%	-35.25%	+6.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.80%	-11.02%	+2.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.96%	-19.51%	+3.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.00%	-20.54%	-6.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.91%	-7.57%	+2.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.13%	-6.31%	-5.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.97%	4.28%	-0.31%

Volatility

ETLF.DE vs. XMLC.DE - Volatility Comparison

L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (ETLF.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.93% compared to L&G Clean Water UCITS ETF (XMLC.DE) at 4.03%. This indicates that ETLF.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMLC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETLF.DE	XMLC.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.93%	4.03%	+1.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.60%	10.79%	+5.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.79%	14.11%	+4.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.09%	15.51%	+1.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.59%	18.66%	-3.07%

ETLF.DE vs. XMLC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETLF.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XMLC.DE's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

ETLF.DE vs. XMLC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETLF.DE nor XMLC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETLF.DE and XMLC.DE in my portfolio?

ETLF.DE and XMLC.DE have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ETLF.DE or XMLC.DE?

On fees, ETLF.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ETLF.DE or XMLC.DE?

ETLF.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for XMLC.DE.

What is the main difference between ETLF.DE and XMLC.DE?

ETLF.DE is categorized as Commodities, while XMLC.DE is Water Equities. ETLF.DE tracks Bloomberg Commodity, while XMLC.DE tracks Solactive Clean Water. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ETLF.DE and 0.49% for XMLC.DE.