ETLF.DE vs. M9SA.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ETLF.DE (L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF) and M9SA.DE (Market Access Rogers International Commodity UCITS ETF) are both Commodities funds - ETLF.DE tracks the Bloomberg Commodity while M9SA.DE tracks the Rogers International Commodity (RICI). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ETLF.DE returned 12.26%/yr vs 13.63%/yr for M9SA.DE. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ETLF.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for M9SA.DE.

Performance

ETLF.DE vs. M9SA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (ETLF.DE) and Market Access Rogers International Commodity UCITS ETF (M9SA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETLF.DE achieves a 23.78% return, which is significantly lower than M9SA.DE's 32.08% return.

ETLF.DE

• 1D: -1.48%
• 1M: -0.32%
• YTD: 23.78%
• 6M: 22.90%
• 1Y: 34.57%
• 3Y*: 12.51%
• 5Y*: 12.26%
• 10Y*: —

M9SA.DE

• 1D: -1.46%
• 1M: -0.03%
• YTD: 32.08%
• 6M: 31.52%
• 1Y: 38.16%
• 3Y*: 12.05%
• 5Y*: 13.63%
• 10Y*: 7.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETLF.DE vs. M9SA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ETLF.DE L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF	23.78%	4.67%	10.97%	-10.24%	21.51%	40.15%	-13.51%	9.35%	-5.45%	2.32%
M9SA.DE Market Access Rogers International Commodity UCITS ETF	32.08%	-4.38%	10.96%	-8.16%	23.00%	52.58%	-18.26%	13.66%	-5.52%	4.88%

Correlation

The correlation between ETLF.DE and M9SA.DE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2017	0.89

The correlation between ETLF.DE and M9SA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ETLF.DE vs. M9SA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETLF.DE

ETLF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 58
ETLF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
ETLF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
ETLF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 56
ETLF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
ETLF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 52

M9SA.DE

M9SA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 57
M9SA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
M9SA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
M9SA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 55
M9SA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
M9SA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETLF.DE vs. M9SA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (ETLF.DE) and Market Access Rogers International Commodity UCITS ETF (M9SA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ETLF.DE	M9SA.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.86	1.77	+0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.36	2.27	+0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.33	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.96	4.36	-0.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.79	8.24	+0.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ETLF.DE vs. M9SA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETLF.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the M9SA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETLF.DE and M9SA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ETLF.DE	M9SA.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.86	1.77	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	0.70	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.42	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.07	+0.46

Drawdowns

ETLF.DE vs. M9SA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETLF.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.78%, smaller than the maximum M9SA.DE drawdown of -68.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETLF.DE and M9SA.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETLF.DE	M9SA.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.78%	-68.53%	+39.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.80%	-8.98%	+0.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.96%	-17.75%	+1.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.00%	-27.06%	+0.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.54%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.91%	-5.62%	+0.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.13%	-33.68%	+21.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.97%	4.76%	-0.79%

Volatility

ETLF.DE vs. M9SA.DE - Volatility Comparison

L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (ETLF.DE) and Market Access Rogers International Commodity UCITS ETF (M9SA.DE) have volatilities of 5.93% and 6.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETLF.DE	M9SA.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.93%	6.09%	-0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.60%	19.44%	-2.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.79%	22.09%	-3.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.09%	19.25%	-2.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.59%	18.11%	-2.52%

ETLF.DE vs. M9SA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETLF.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than M9SA.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

ETLF.DE vs. M9SA.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ETLF.DE nor M9SA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETLF.DE and M9SA.DE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, ETLF.DE and M9SA.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, ETLF.DE or M9SA.DE?

On fees, ETLF.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ETLF.DE or M9SA.DE?

ETLF.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for M9SA.DE.

What is the main difference between ETLF.DE and M9SA.DE?

ETLF.DE tracks Bloomberg Commodity, while M9SA.DE tracks Rogers International Commodity (RICI). They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and China Post Global. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ETLF.DE and 0.60% for M9SA.DE.