ETLF.DE vs. GSDE.DE
ETLF.DE (L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF) and GSDE.DE (BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR) are both Commodities funds - ETLF.DE tracks the Bloomberg Commodity while GSDE.DE tracks the BNP Paribas Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ETLF.DE returned 12.26%/yr vs 14.84%/yr for GSDE.DE. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ETLF.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for GSDE.DE.
Performance
ETLF.DE vs. GSDE.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ETLF.DE having a 23.78% return and GSDE.DE slightly higher at 23.86%.
ETLF.DE
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- 23.78%
- 6M
- 22.90%
- 1Y
- 34.57%
- 3Y*
- 12.51%
- 5Y*
- 12.26%
- 10Y*
- —
GSDE.DE
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 1.80%
- YTD
- 23.86%
- 6M
- 24.24%
- 1Y
- 44.12%
- 3Y*
- 15.82%
- 5Y*
- 14.84%
- 10Y*
- 9.70%
ETLF.DE vs. GSDE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETLF.DE L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF | 23.78% | 4.67% | 10.97% | -10.24% | 21.51% | 40.15% | -13.51% | 9.35% | -5.45% | 2.32% |
GSDE.DE BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR | 23.86% | 13.74% | 14.93% | -12.88% | 21.59% | 38.67% | -11.20% | 13.32% | -3.71% | 7.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETLF.DE and GSDE.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2017 | 0.87 |
The correlation between ETLF.DE and GSDE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETLF.DE vs. GSDE.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ETLF.DE
GSDE.DE
ETLF.DE vs. GSDE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (ETLF.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR (GSDE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETLF.DE | GSDE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.43 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.96 | 5.65 | -1.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.79 | 12.60 | -3.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETLF.DE | GSDE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | 2.37 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.82 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.09 | +0.44 |
Drawdowns
ETLF.DE vs. GSDE.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETLF.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.78%, smaller than the maximum GSDE.DE drawdown of -68.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETLF.DE and GSDE.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETLF.DE | GSDE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.78% | -68.91% | +40.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.80% | -7.89% | -0.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.96% | -15.25% | -0.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.00% | -29.72% | +2.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.91% | -6.40% | +1.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.13% | -44.09% | +31.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.97% | 3.54% | +0.43% |
Volatility
ETLF.DE vs. GSDE.DE - Volatility Comparison
L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (ETLF.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.93% compared to BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR (GSDE.DE) at 4.51%. This indicates that ETLF.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSDE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETLF.DE | GSDE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.93% | 4.51% | +1.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.60% | 16.35% | +0.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.79% | 18.80% | -0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.09% | 17.84% | -0.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.59% | 15.76% | -0.17% |
ETLF.DE vs. GSDE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETLF.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GSDE.DE's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETLF.DE vs. GSDE.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ETLF.DE nor GSDE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, ETLF.DE and GSDE.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, ETLF.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ETLF.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for GSDE.DE.
ETLF.DE tracks Bloomberg Commodity, while GSDE.DE tracks BNP Paribas Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and BNP Paribas. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ETLF.DE and 0.39% for GSDE.DE.
Find the right allocation for ETLF.DE and GSDE.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer