ETIDX vs. ERASX
ETIDX (Eventide Dividend Opportunities Fund) and ERASX (Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class A) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, ETIDX returned 7.96%/yr vs 5.16%/yr for ERASX. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ETIDX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for ERASX.
Performance
ETIDX vs. ERASX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETIDX achieves a 15.08% return, which is significantly higher than ERASX's 5.31% return.
ETIDX
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -2.19%
- 6M
- 9.24%
- YTD
- 15.08%
- 1Y
- 17.01%
- 3Y*
- 14.79%
- 5Y*
- 7.96%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.37%
ERASX
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- 3.34%
- 6M
- 3.97%
- YTD
- 5.31%
- 1Y
- 2.49%
- 3Y*
- 7.00%
- 5Y*
- 5.16%
- 10Y*
- 11.20%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.33%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
ETIDX vs. ERASX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETIDX Eventide Dividend Opportunities Fund | 15.08% | 5.67% | 16.56% | 19.67% | -21.77% | 31.98% | 25.38% | 27.07% | -10.37% | 3.36% |
ERASX Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class A | 5.31% | -5.59% | 17.74% | 14.08% | -8.72% | 22.10% | 11.40% | 44.21% | -5.47% | 7.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETIDX and ERASX is 0.50, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2017 | 0.81 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ETIDX and ERASX has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETIDX vs. ERASX — Risk / Return Rank
ETIDX
ERASX
ETIDX vs. ERASX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eventide Dividend Opportunities Fund (ETIDX) and Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class A (ERASX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETIDX | ERASX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.00 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | -0.09 | +2.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.42 | -0.19 | +6.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETIDX vs. ERASX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETIDX drawdown since its inception was -34.12%, smaller than the maximum ERASX drawdown of -39.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETIDX and ERASX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETIDX | ERASX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.12% | -39.94% | +5.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.60% | -12.67% | +5.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.51% | -19.36% | -1.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.11% | -19.77% | -9.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.40% | -6.30% | +0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.01% | -5.14% | -1.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 6.38% | -3.76% |
Volatility
ETIDX vs. ERASX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eventide Dividend Opportunities Fund (ETIDX) is 3.85%, while Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class A (ERASX) has a volatility of 5.63%. This indicates that ETIDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ERASX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETIDX | ERASX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.85% | 5.63% | -1.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.50% | 12.10% | +0.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.45% | 16.16% | -0.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.86% | 17.15% | +0.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.25% | 18.94% | -0.69% |
ETIDX vs. ERASX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETIDX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ERASX's 0.81% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETIDX vs. ERASX - Dividend Comparison
ETIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, less than ERASX's 6.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERASX Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class A | 6.11% | 6.44% | 7.29% | 2.82% | 10.26% | 10.40% | 9.73% | 13.15% | 7.16% | 3.29% | 3.57% | 6.68% |
ETIDX Eventide Dividend Opportunities Fund | 3.08% | 3.58% | 0.64% | 0.67% | 1.98% | 2.78% | 1.05% | 1.99% | 2.16% | 1.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETIDX and ERASX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ERASX has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to ETIDX (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETIDX dropped -34.12% vs ERASX's -39.94%.
ETIDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETIDX and ERASX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer