ETHO vs. SPMD
ETHO (Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF) and SPMD (SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - ETHO tracks the Etho Climate Leadership Index while SPMD tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ETHO returned 34.51% vs 25.49% for SPMD. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ETHO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPMD.
Performance
ETHO vs. SPMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHO achieves a 17.28% return, which is significantly higher than SPMD's 14.16% return.
ETHO
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 4.96%
- YTD
- 17.28%
- 6M
- 16.47%
- 1Y
- 34.51%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPMD
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 3.86%
- YTD
- 14.16%
- 6M
- 14.41%
- 1Y
- 25.49%
- 3Y*
- 16.15%
- 5Y*
- 8.20%
- 10Y*
- 11.51%
ETHO vs. SPMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ETHO Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF | 17.28% | 10.23% | 8.17% |
SPMD SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF | 14.16% | 7.44% | 13.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHO and SPMD is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024 | 0.95 |
The correlation between ETHO and SPMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHO vs. SPMD — Risk / Return Rank
ETHO
SPMD
ETHO vs. SPMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF (SPMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHO | SPMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.29 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.75 | 2.89 | +0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.52 | 10.61 | +3.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHO | SPMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.97 | 1.65 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.45 | +0.35 |
Drawdowns
ETHO vs. SPMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHO drawdown since its inception was -25.50%, smaller than the maximum SPMD drawdown of -57.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHO and SPMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHO | SPMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.50% | -57.62% | +32.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.25% | -8.86% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -0.08% | -0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.50% | -8.12% | +3.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.38% | 2.41% | -0.03% |
Volatility
ETHO vs. SPMD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO) is 4.11%, while SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF (SPMD) has a volatility of 4.38%. This indicates that ETHO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHO | SPMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.11% | 4.38% | -0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.77% | 11.37% | +1.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.64% | 15.57% | +2.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.40% | 19.70% | -0.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.40% | 21.18% | -1.78% |
ETHO vs. SPMD - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMD's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHO vs. SPMD - Dividend Comparison
ETHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than SPMD's 1.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETHO Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF | 0.73% | 0.86% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMD SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF | 1.23% | 1.39% | 1.42% | 1.47% | 1.64% | 1.24% | 1.30% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 1.97% | 2.13% | 5.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, ETHO and SPMD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SPMD has higher volatility (4.38%) compared to ETHO (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHO dropped -25.50% vs SPMD's -57.62%.
On 1-year performance, ETHO leads with 34.51% vs 25.49% for SPMD. On fees, SPMD is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, ETHO has been the lower-risk option at 4.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ETHO has performed better with a 34.51% return vs 25.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMD is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ETHO.
SPMD has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.73% for ETHO.
ETHO tracks Etho Climate Leadership Index, while SPMD tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ETHO and 0.05% for SPMD.
ETHO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETHO and SPMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer