ETHO vs. PEXL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ETHO (Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF) and PEXL (Pacer US Export Leaders ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - ETHO tracks the Etho Climate Leadership Index while PEXL tracks the Pacer US Export Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ETHO returned 34.51% vs 53.95% for PEXL. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ETHO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PEXL.

Performance

ETHO vs. PEXL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO) and Pacer US Export Leaders ETF (PEXL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHO achieves a 17.28% return, which is significantly lower than PEXL's 23.12% return.

ETHO

• 1D: -0.81%
• 1M: 4.96%
• YTD: 17.28%
• 6M: 16.47%
• 1Y: 34.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PEXL

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 12.19%
• YTD: 23.12%
• 6M: 24.66%
• 1Y: 53.95%
• 3Y*: 22.51%
• 5Y*: 13.25%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETHO vs. PEXL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ETHO Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF	17.28%	10.23%	8.17%
PEXL Pacer US Export Leaders ETF	23.12%	27.33%	4.91%

Correlation

The correlation between ETHO and PEXL is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024	0.89

The correlation between ETHO and PEXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

ETHO vs. PEXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ETHO	PEXL
Technology	26.3%	55.1%
Industrials	16.7%	6.4%
Financial Services	13.0%	-
Healthcare	11.6%	7.5%
Consumer Cyclical	10.8%	4.3%
Real Estate	6.5%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	6.3%
Communication Services	4.5%	15.1%
Basic Materials	3.1%	4.2%
Utilities	2.5%	-
Energy	0.4%	1.1%

Return for Risk

ETHO vs. PEXL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHO

ETHO Risk / Return Rank: 64
ETHO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
ETHO Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
ETHO Omega Ratio Rank: 54
ETHO Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
ETHO Martin Ratio Rank: 76

PEXL

PEXL Risk / Return Rank: 87
PEXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
PEXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
PEXL Omega Ratio Rank: 83
PEXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
PEXL Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHO vs. PEXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO) and Pacer US Export Leaders ETF (PEXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ETHO	PEXL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.97	3.05	-1.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.79	4.00	-1.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.51	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.75	4.74	-0.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.52	20.42	-5.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ETHO vs. PEXL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHO Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is lower than the PEXL Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHO and PEXL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ETHO	PEXL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.97	3.05	-1.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.61	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.80	0.65	+0.14

Drawdowns

ETHO vs. PEXL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHO drawdown since its inception was -25.50%, smaller than the maximum PEXL drawdown of -36.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHO and PEXL.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETHO	PEXL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.50%	-36.76%	+11.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.25%	-11.43%	+2.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.72%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.81%	0.00%	-0.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.50%	-6.72%	+2.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.38%	2.65%	-0.27%

Volatility

ETHO vs. PEXL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO) is 4.11%, while Pacer US Export Leaders ETF (PEXL) has a volatility of 5.25%. This indicates that ETHO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PEXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETHO	PEXL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.11%	5.25%	-1.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.77%	13.10%	-0.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.64%	17.80%	-0.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.40%	21.86%	-2.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.40%	24.04%	-4.64%

ETHO vs. PEXL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than PEXL's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

ETHO vs. PEXL - Dividend Comparison

ETHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, more than PEXL's 0.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ETHO Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF	0.73%	0.86%	0.69%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PEXL Pacer US Export Leaders ETF	0.34%	0.44%	0.48%	0.48%	0.60%	0.22%	0.48%	0.49%	0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETHO and PEXL in my portfolio?

ETHO and PEXL have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ETHO or PEXL?

PEXL has higher volatility (5.25%) compared to ETHO (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHO dropped -25.50% vs PEXL's -36.76%.

Which ETF is better, ETHO or PEXL?

On 1-year performance, PEXL leads with 53.95% vs 34.51% for ETHO. On fees, ETHO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, ETHO has been the lower-risk option at 4.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ETHO or PEXL?

Over the 1-year period, PEXL has performed better with a 53.95% return vs 34.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ETHO or PEXL?

ETHO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PEXL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ETHO or PEXL?

ETHO has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.34% for PEXL.

What is the main difference between ETHO and PEXL?

ETHO tracks Etho Climate Leadership Index, while PEXL tracks Pacer US Export Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ETHO and 0.60% for PEXL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PEXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.