PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ETHI.TO vs. XMY.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ETHI.TO vs. XMY.TO

Last updated Jul 18, 2026
Documentation

ETHI.TO (Global X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF) and XMY.TO (iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) are both Global Equities funds. ETHI.TO is actively managed, while XMY.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ETHI.TO returned 6.61%/yr vs 5.87%/yr for XMY.TO. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ETHI.TO vs. XMY.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF (ETHI.TO) and iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMY.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHI.TO achieves a 7.97% return, which is significantly higher than XMY.TO's 3.07% return.

ETHI.TO

1D
-0.56%
1M
2.79%
6M
6.99%
YTD
7.97%
1Y
14.75%
3Y*
12.45%
5Y*
6.61%
10Y*
—

XMY.TO

1D
0.71%
1M
0.96%
6M
2.98%
YTD
3.07%
1Y
6.03%
3Y*
9.55%
5Y*
5.87%
10Y*
6.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETHI.TO vs. XMY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ETHI.TO
Global X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF		7.97%8.90%15.46%23.45%-23.60%22.09%35.86%27.19%-2.52%
XMY.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		3.07%9.22%13.48%7.15%-7.59%16.37%-1.31%19.41%-1.99%

Correlation

The correlation between ETHI.TO and XMY.TO is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2018

0.40

Over the past year, the correlation between ETHI.TO and XMY.TO has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Global X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF

iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

Often compared with ETHI.TO:
ETHI.TO vs. CASH.TOETHI.TO vs. CBIL.TOETHI.TO vs. CHPS.TOETHI.TO vs. CIE.NEOETHI.TO vs. CYH.TOETHI.TO vs. FGEP.TOETHI.TO vs. FINN.NEO
Often compared with XMY.TO:
XMY.TO vs. XMU.TOXMY.TO vs. XMV.TOXMY.TO vs. XML.TOXMY.TO vs. CAGE.TOXMY.TO vs. FCIN.NEOXMY.TO vs. XEQT.TOXMY.TO vs. VMO.TO

Return for Risk

ETHI.TO vs. XMY.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ETHI.TO
ETHI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
ETHI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
XMY.TO
XMY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
XMY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
XMY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHI.TO vs. XMY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF (ETHI.TO) and iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

ETHI.TOXMY.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.06
0.59

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.60
0.88

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.14

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

0.90

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.63

2.94

+1.69

ETHI.TO vs. XMY.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHI.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is higher than the XMY.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHI.TO and XMY.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ETHI.TO vs. XMY.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHI.TO drawdown since its inception was -32.78%, which is greater than XMY.TO's maximum drawdown of -29.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHI.TO and XMY.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ETHI.TOXMY.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.78%

-29.00%

-3.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.59%

-6.74%

-4.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.07%

-8.10%

-10.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.97%

-13.89%

-18.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-29.00%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-1.46%

+0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.85%

-3.27%

-3.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

2.05%

+1.14%

Volatility

ETHI.TO vs. XMY.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF (ETHI.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.39% compared to iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMY.TO) at 2.76%. This indicates that ETHI.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ETHI.TOXMY.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

2.76%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.34%

8.98%

+2.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.02%

10.22%

+3.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.06%

10.19%

+6.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.95%

11.51%

+8.44%

Dividends

ETHI.TO vs. XMY.TO - Dividend Comparison

ETHI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than XMY.TO's 1.73% yield.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ETHI.TO
Global X Global Sustainability Leaders Index ETF		0.81%0.99%0.82%1.06%1.09%1.22%0.84%0.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XMY.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol Global Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		1.73%1.90%1.91%1.90%1.71%1.40%1.37%2.16%1.45%1.57%2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

ETHI.TO and XMY.TO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETHI.TO and XMY.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer