ETHI.AX vs. A200.AX

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

ETHI.AX (Betashares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF) and A200.AX (Betashares Australia 200 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHI.AX is a Global Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Future Global Sustainability Leaders Index, while A200.AX is a fund fund tracking the Solactive Australia 200 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ETHI.AX returned 9.58%/yr vs 7.10%/yr for A200.AX. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ETHI.AX charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for A200.AX.

Performance

ETHI.AX vs. A200.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Betashares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF (ETHI.AX) and Betashares Australia 200 ETF (A200.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHI.AX achieves a 3.99% return, which is significantly higher than A200.AX's 2.54% return.

ETHI.AX

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 3.31%
• 6M: 4.06%
• YTD: 3.99%
• 1Y: 9.57%
• 3Y*: 13.69%
• 5Y*: 9.58%
• 10Y*: —

A200.AX

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: -0.63%
• 6M: 2.18%
• YTD: 2.54%
• 1Y: 5.19%
• 3Y*: 9.64%
• 5Y*: 7.10%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETHI.AX vs. A200.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ETHI.AX Betashares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF	3.99%	4.56%	27.20%	22.81%	-15.53%	31.01%	24.65%	36.89%	1.78%
A200.AX Betashares Australia 200 ETF	2.54%	10.31%	9.74%	10.96%	-1.18%	17.90%	1.16%	22.87%	-3.83%

Correlation

The correlation between ETHI.AX and A200.AX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2018	0.56

The correlation between ETHI.AX and A200.AX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ETHI.AX vs. A200.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHI.AX

ETHI.AX Risk / Return Rank: 24
ETHI.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
ETHI.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
ETHI.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
ETHI.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
ETHI.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

A200.AX

A200.AX Risk / Return Rank: 18
A200.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
A200.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
A200.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
A200.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
A200.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHI.AX vs. A200.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Betashares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF (ETHI.AX) and Betashares Australia 200 ETF (A200.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ETHI.AX	A200.AX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	0.49	+0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.28	0.79	+0.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.10	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.68	0.70	-0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.60	1.65	-0.05

ETHI.AX vs. A200.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHI.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is higher than the A200.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHI.AX and A200.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ETHI.AX vs. A200.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHI.AX drawdown since its inception was -25.44%, smaller than the maximum A200.AX drawdown of -35.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHI.AX and A200.AX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETHI.AX	A200.AX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.44%	-35.55%	+10.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.99%	-8.40%	-6.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.65%	-13.22%	-2.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.44%	-14.79%	-10.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.00%	-2.62%	+1.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.63%	-4.25%	-0.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.42%	3.62%	+2.80%

Volatility

ETHI.AX vs. A200.AX - Volatility Comparison

Betashares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF (ETHI.AX) has a higher volatility of 2.80% compared to Betashares Australia 200 ETF (A200.AX) at 2.37%. This indicates that ETHI.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than A200.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETHI.AX	A200.AX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.80%	2.37%	+0.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.74%	9.74%	0.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.68%	11.99%	-0.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.05%	12.62%	+1.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.73%	15.17%	-0.44%

ETHI.AX vs. A200.AX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHI.AX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than A200.AX's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

ETHI.AX vs. A200.AX - Dividend Comparison

ETHI.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than A200.AX's 2.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
A200.AX Betashares Australia 200 ETF	2.51%	3.33%	1.57%	2.89%	5.68%	2.98%	2.54%	3.61%	1.40%	0.00%
ETHI.AX Betashares Global Sustainability Leaders ETF	1.55%	1.86%	2.11%	4.40%	2.43%	5.04%	10.20%	3.90%	1.69%	1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETHI.AX and A200.AX in my portfolio?

ETHI.AX and A200.AX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ETHI.AX or A200.AX?

On fees, A200.AX is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ETHI.AX or A200.AX?

A200.AX is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for ETHI.AX.

What is the main difference between ETHI.AX and A200.AX?

ETHI.AX tracks Nasdaq Future Global Sustainability Leaders Index, while A200.AX tracks Solactive Australia 200 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for ETHI.AX and 0.04% for A200.AX.