PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETHH.TO vs. YTSL.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ETHH.TO vs. YTSL.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Ether ETF (ETHH.TO) and Tesla (TSLA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YTSL.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ETHH.TO vs. YTSL.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ETHH.TO
Purpose Ether ETF
-28.98%-14.37%38.87%91.16%0.81%
YTSL.NEO
Tesla (TSLA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF
-15.65%27.43%46.11%106.56%-20.20%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHH.TO achieves a -28.98% return, which is significantly lower than YTSL.NEO's -15.65% return.


ETHH.TO

1D
2.03%
1M
4.55%
YTD
-28.98%
6M
-51.68%
1Y
8.21%
3Y*
1.76%
5Y*
10Y*

YTSL.NEO

1D
7.76%
1M
-6.01%
YTD
-15.65%
6M
-4.28%
1Y
71.44%
3Y*
26.06%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ETHH.TO vs. YTSL.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHH.TO has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than YTSL.NEO's 1.65% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ETHH.TO vs. YTSL.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHH.TO
ETHH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
ETHH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

YTSL.NEO
YTSL.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
YTSL.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YTSL.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
YTSL.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
YTSL.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
YTSL.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHH.TO vs. YTSL.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Ether ETF (ETHH.TO) and Tesla (TSLA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YTSL.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETHH.TOYTSL.NEODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.11

1.33

-1.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.72

1.88

-1.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.25

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.20

3.25

-3.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.41

8.75

-8.34

ETHH.TO vs. YTSL.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the YTSL.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHH.TO and YTSL.NEO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETHH.TOYTSL.NEODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

1.33

-1.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.08

0.54

-0.61

Correlation

The correlation between ETHH.TO and YTSL.NEO is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ETHH.TO vs. YTSL.NEO - Dividend Comparison

ETHH.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while YTSL.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 47.25%.


TTM2025202420232022
ETHH.TO
Purpose Ether ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
YTSL.NEO
Tesla (TSLA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF
47.25%36.11%12.80%24.07%1.96%

Drawdowns

ETHH.TO vs. YTSL.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHH.TO drawdown since its inception was -79.46%, which is greater than YTSL.NEO's maximum drawdown of -58.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHH.TO and YTSL.NEO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ETHH.TOYTSL.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.46%

-58.40%

-21.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-62.39%

-23.95%

-38.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.13%

-16.60%

-45.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.65%

-20.85%

-27.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.13%

8.89%

+22.24%

Volatility

ETHH.TO vs. YTSL.NEO - Volatility Comparison

Purpose Ether ETF (ETHH.TO) has a higher volatility of 18.87% compared to Tesla (TSLA) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YTSL.NEO) at 14.81%. This indicates that ETHH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YTSL.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ETHH.TOYTSL.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.87%

14.81%

+4.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.14%

32.59%

+20.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

74.53%

53.99%

+20.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

73.88%

62.89%

+10.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.88%

62.89%

+10.99%