ETHH.TO vs. MNY.TO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Purpose Ether ETF (ETHH.TO) and Purpose Cash Management Fund (MNY.TO).

ETHH.TO and MNY.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ETHH.TO is an actively managed fund by Purpose Investments. It was launched on Oct 14, 2021. MNY.TO is an actively managed fund by Purpose Investments. It was launched on Sep 14, 2022.

Performance

ETHH.TO vs. MNY.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Ether ETF (ETHH.TO) and Purpose Cash Management Fund (MNY.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ETHH.TO vs. MNY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ETHH.TO Purpose Ether ETF	-28.98%	-14.37%	38.87%	91.16%	-26.44%
MNY.TO Purpose Cash Management Fund	0.54%	3.03%	4.69%	5.03%	1.54%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHH.TO achieves a -28.98% return, which is significantly lower than MNY.TO's 0.54% return.

ETHH.TO

• 1D: 2.03%
• 1M: 4.55%
• YTD: -28.98%
• 6M: -51.68%
• 1Y: 8.21%
• 3Y*: 1.76%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MNY.TO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 0.54%
• 6M: 1.27%
• 1Y: 2.69%
• 3Y*: 4.05%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETHH.TO vs. MNY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHH.TO has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than MNY.TO's 0.22% expense ratio.

ETHH.TO

Purpose Ether ETF

MNY.TO

Purpose Cash Management Fund

Return for Risk

ETHH.TO vs. MNY.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHH.TO

ETHH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 17
ETHH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
ETHH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
ETHH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 20
ETHH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
ETHH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 14

MNY.TO

MNY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 100
MNY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MNY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
MNY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 100
MNY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MNY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHH.TO vs. MNY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Ether ETF (ETHH.TO) and Purpose Cash Management Fund (MNY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ETHH.TO	MNY.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.11	15.32	-15.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.72	52.67	-51.96
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	19.96	-18.88
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.20	67.75	-67.55
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.41	622.62	-622.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ETHH.TO vs. MNY.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the MNY.TO Sharpe Ratio of 15.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHH.TO and MNY.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ETHH.TO	MNY.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11	15.32	-15.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.08	11.02	-11.10

Correlation

The correlation between ETHH.TO and MNY.TO is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ETHH.TO vs. MNY.TO - Dividend Comparison

ETHH.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MNY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
ETHH.TO Purpose Ether ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MNY.TO Purpose Cash Management Fund	2.67%	2.93%	4.71%	4.85%	1.47%

Drawdowns

ETHH.TO vs. MNY.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHH.TO drawdown since its inception was -79.46%, which is greater than MNY.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHH.TO and MNY.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETHH.TO	MNY.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.46%	-0.24%	-79.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-62.39%	-0.04%	-62.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-62.13%	0.00%	-62.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-48.65%	0.00%	-48.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	31.13%	0.00%	+31.13%

Volatility

ETHH.TO vs. MNY.TO - Volatility Comparison

Purpose Ether ETF (ETHH.TO) has a higher volatility of 18.87% compared to Purpose Cash Management Fund (MNY.TO) at 0.03%. This indicates that ETHH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETHH.TO	MNY.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.87%	0.03%	+18.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.14%	0.13%	+53.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	74.53%	0.18%	+74.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	73.88%	0.38%	+73.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	73.88%	0.38%	+73.50%