ETHE vs. MNRS

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

ETHE (Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF) and MNRS (Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHE is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CoinDesk Ether Price Index, while MNRS is a Blockchain fund tracking the Indxx Bitcoin Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ETHE returned -49.53% vs 38.67% for MNRS. Their 0.58 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ETHE charges 2.50%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for MNRS.

Performance

ETHE vs. MNRS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHE) and Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHE achieves a -37.21% return, which is significantly lower than MNRS's 20.57% return.

ETHE

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 10.22%
• 6M: -18.72%
• YTD: -37.21%
• 1Y: -49.53%
• 3Y*: 10.35%
• 5Y*: -10.40%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.34%

MNRS

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: -1.83%
• 6M: 5.31%
• YTD: 20.57%
• 1Y: 38.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 23.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ETHE Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF	$26.36M	$26.52M	$33.93M
MNRS Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF	$334.32K	$247.38K	$543.60K

ETHE vs. MNRS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ETHE Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF	-37.21%	-7.13%
MNRS Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF	20.57%	14.05%

Correlation

The correlation between ETHE and MNRS is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2025	0.58

The correlation between ETHE and MNRS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ETHE vs. MNRS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ETHE

ETHE Risk / Return Rank: 3
ETHE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
ETHE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
ETHE Omega Ratio Rank: 3
ETHE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
ETHE Martin Ratio Rank: 4

MNRS

MNRS Risk / Return Rank: 23
MNRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
MNRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
MNRS Omega Ratio Rank: 27
MNRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
MNRS Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ETHE vs. MNRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHE) and Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ETHE	MNRS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.75	0.51	-1.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.97	1.22	-2.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.14	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.73	0.69	-1.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.08	1.25	-2.33

ETHE vs. MNRS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHE Sharpe Ratio is -0.75, which is lower than the MNRS Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHE and MNRS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ETHE vs. MNRS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHE drawdown since its inception was -96.26%, which is greater than MNRS's maximum drawdown of -56.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHE and MNRS.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETHE	MNRS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.26%	-56.70%	-39.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-68.17%	-56.70%	-11.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-68.17%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-89.85%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-76.25%	-33.54%	-42.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-72.32%	-23.97%	-48.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	45.97%	30.98%	+14.99%

Volatility

ETHE vs. MNRS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHE) is 11.25%, while Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS) has a volatility of 28.62%. This indicates that ETHE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETHE	MNRS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.25%	28.62%	-17.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.39%	56.69%	-13.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	66.84%	75.70%	-8.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	80.93%	72.67%	+8.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	189.73%	72.67%	+117.06%

ETHE vs. MNRS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHE has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MNRS's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

ETHE vs. MNRS - Dividend Comparison

ETHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, more than MNRS's 0.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ETHE Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF	1.59%	0.00%
MNRS Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF	0.45%	0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETHE and MNRS in my portfolio?

ETHE and MNRS have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ETHE or MNRS?

MNRS has higher volatility (28.62%) compared to ETHE (11.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHE dropped -96.26% vs MNRS's -56.70%.

Which ETF is better, ETHE or MNRS?

On 1-year performance, MNRS leads with 38.67% vs -49.53% for ETHE. On fees, MNRS is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, ETHE has been the lower-risk option at 11.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ETHE or MNRS?

Over the 1-year period, MNRS has performed better with a 38.67% return vs -49.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ETHE or MNRS?

MNRS is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ETHE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ETHE or MNRS?

ETHE has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.45% for MNRS.

What is the main difference between ETHE and MNRS?

ETHE is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while MNRS is Blockchain. ETHE tracks CoinDesk Ether Price Index, while MNRS tracks Indxx Bitcoin Miners Index. Their fees differ too: 2.50% for ETHE and 0.59% for MNRS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MNRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.51 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.