PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETHE vs. MNRS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETHE vs. MNRS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHE) and Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHE achieves a -39.63% return, which is significantly lower than MNRS's 66.15% return.


ETHE

1D
-5.64%
1M
-23.64%
YTD
-39.63%
6M
-42.89%
1Y
-32.48%
3Y*
19.37%
5Y*
-11.60%
10Y*

MNRS

1D
-2.00%
1M
35.90%
YTD
66.15%
6M
40.56%
1Y
129.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETHE vs. MNRS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ETHE
Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF
-39.63%-9.87%
MNRS
Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF
66.15%12.66%

Correlation

The correlation between ETHE and MNRS is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2025

0.60

The correlation between ETHE and MNRS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETHE vs. MNRS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHE
ETHE Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
ETHE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHE Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHE Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHE Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

MNRS
MNRS Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
MNRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNRS Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
MNRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNRS Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHE vs. MNRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHE) and Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETHEMNRSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.28

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.52

2.29

-2.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.86

4.48

-5.34

ETHE vs. MNRS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHE Sharpe Ratio is -0.48, which is lower than the MNRS Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHE and MNRS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETHEMNRSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.48

1.85

-2.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.85

-0.79

Drawdowns

ETHE vs. MNRS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHE drawdown since its inception was -96.26%, which is greater than MNRS's maximum drawdown of -56.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHE and MNRS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETHEMNRSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.26%

-56.70%

-39.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-63.16%

-56.70%

-6.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-89.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-77.17%

-8.42%

-68.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-72.23%

-23.73%

-48.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.98%

28.93%

+9.05%

Volatility

ETHE vs. MNRS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHE) is 9.87%, while Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS) has a volatility of 20.30%. This indicates that ETHE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETHEMNRSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.87%

20.30%

-10.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.00%

52.57%

-6.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.31%

70.28%

-1.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.26%

70.50%

+11.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

191.84%

70.50%

+121.34%

ETHE vs. MNRS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHE has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MNRS's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETHE vs. MNRS - Dividend Comparison

ETHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, more than MNRS's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM2025
ETHE
Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF
1.35%0.00%
MNRS
Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF
0.33%0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


ETHE and MNRS have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MNRS has higher volatility (20.30%) compared to ETHE (9.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHE dropped -96.26% vs MNRS's -56.70%.

On 1-year performance, MNRS leads with 129.17% vs -32.48% for ETHE. On fees, MNRS is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, ETHE has been the lower-risk option at 9.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MNRS has performed better with a 129.17% return vs -32.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MNRS is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ETHE.

ETHE has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.33% for MNRS.

ETHE is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while MNRS is Blockchain. ETHE tracks CoinDesk Ether Price Index , while MNRS tracks Indxx Bitcoin Miners Index. Their fees differ too: 2.50% for ETHE and 0.59% for MNRS.

MNRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETHE and MNRS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer