ETHE vs. FFUT
ETHE (Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF) and FFUT (Fidelity Managed Futures ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHE is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CoinDesk Ether Price Index , while FFUT is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Fidelity. ETHE is passively managed, while FFUT is actively managed. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ETHE charges 2.50%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FFUT.
Performance
ETHE vs. FFUT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHE achieves a -39.63% return, which is significantly lower than FFUT's 12.74% return.
ETHE
- 1D
- -5.64%
- 1M
- -23.64%
- YTD
- -39.63%
- 6M
- -42.89%
- 1Y
- -32.48%
- 3Y*
- 19.37%
- 5Y*
- -11.60%
- 10Y*
- —
FFUT
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 1.16%
- YTD
- 12.74%
- 6M
- 14.35%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHE vs. FFUT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETHE Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF | -39.63% | 16.16% |
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF | 12.74% | 8.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHE and FFUT is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHE vs. FFUT — Risk / Return Rank
ETHE
FFUT
ETHE vs. FFUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHE) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHE | FFUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHE | FFUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 2.01 | -1.94 |
Drawdowns
ETHE vs. FFUT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHE drawdown since its inception was -96.26%, which is greater than FFUT's maximum drawdown of -2.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHE and FFUT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHE | FFUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.26% | -2.84% | -93.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -89.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.17% | -0.90% | -76.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.23% | -0.88% | -71.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.98% | — | — |
Volatility
ETHE vs. FFUT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHE | FFUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.87% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.00% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.31% | 11.17% | +57.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.26% | 11.17% | +71.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 191.84% | 11.17% | +180.67% |
ETHE vs. FFUT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHE has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FFUT's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHE vs. FFUT - Dividend Comparison
ETHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than FFUT's 1.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ETHE Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF | 1.35% | 0.00% |
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF | 1.85% | 2.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHE and FFUT have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FFUT is cheaper at 0.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FFUT is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ETHE.
FFUT has the higher dividend yield at 1.85%, compared with 1.35% for ETHE.
ETHE is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while FFUT is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 2.50% for ETHE and 0.80% for FFUT.
Find the right allocation for ETHE and FFUT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer