ETHE vs. CBOL
ETHE (Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF) and CBOL (Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHE is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CoinDesk Ether Price Index , while CBOL is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. ETHE is passively managed, while CBOL is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ETHE charges 2.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for CBOL.
Performance
ETHE vs. CBOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHE achieves a -39.63% return, which is significantly lower than CBOL's -2.03% return.
ETHE
- 1D
- -5.64%
- 1M
- -23.64%
- YTD
- -39.63%
- 6M
- -42.89%
- 1Y
- -32.48%
- 3Y*
- 19.37%
- 5Y*
- -11.60%
- 10Y*
- —
CBOL
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -0.78%
- YTD
- -2.03%
- 6M
- -2.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHE vs. CBOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETHE Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF | -39.63% | -27.86% |
CBOL Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF | -2.03% | -2.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHE and CBOL is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHE vs. CBOL — Risk / Return Rank
ETHE
CBOL
ETHE vs. CBOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHE) and Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF (CBOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHE | CBOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHE | CBOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | -1.80 | +1.86 |
Drawdowns
ETHE vs. CBOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHE drawdown since its inception was -96.26%, which is greater than CBOL's maximum drawdown of -4.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHE and CBOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHE | CBOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.26% | -4.91% | -91.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -89.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.17% | -4.64% | -72.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.23% | -3.21% | -69.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.98% | — | — |
Volatility
ETHE vs. CBOL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHE | CBOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.87% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.00% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.31% | 3.88% | +64.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.26% | 3.88% | +78.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 191.84% | 3.88% | +187.96% |
ETHE vs. CBOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHE has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CBOL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHE vs. CBOL - Dividend Comparison
ETHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than CBOL's 1.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CBOL Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF | 1.83% | 1.79% |
ETHE Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF | 1.35% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, ETHE and CBOL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, CBOL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBOL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ETHE.
CBOL has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 1.35% for ETHE.
ETHE is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBOL is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 2.50% for ETHE and 0.79% for CBOL.
Find the right allocation for ETHE and CBOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer