ETHC.DE vs. IUSN.DE
ETHC.DE (21Shares Ethereum Core Staking ETP) and IUSN.DE (iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHC.DE is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by 21Shares, while IUSN.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Small Cap. ETHC.DE is actively managed, while IUSN.DE is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ETHC.DE returned -3.71%/yr vs 14.95%/yr for IUSN.DE. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ETHC.DE charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for IUSN.DE.
Performance
ETHC.DE vs. IUSN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHC.DE achieves a -39.39% return, which is significantly lower than IUSN.DE's 14.82% return.
ETHC.DE
- 1D
- -3.70%
- 1M
- -24.79%
- YTD
- -39.39%
- 6M
- -43.92%
- 1Y
- -33.47%
- 3Y*
- -3.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IUSN.DE
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 3.94%
- YTD
- 14.82%
- 6M
- 15.82%
- 1Y
- 30.05%
- 3Y*
- 14.95%
- 5Y*
- 8.07%
- 10Y*
- —
ETHC.DE vs. IUSN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETHC.DE 21Shares Ethereum Core Staking ETP | -39.39% | -21.50% | 52.05% | 90.66% | -17.54% |
IUSN.DE iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF | 14.82% | 7.82% | 13.17% | 13.11% | 1.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHC.DE and IUSN.DE is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2022 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHC.DE vs. IUSN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ETHC.DE
IUSN.DE
ETHC.DE vs. IUSN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 21Shares Ethereum Core Staking ETP (ETHC.DE) and iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (IUSN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHC.DE | IUSN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.39 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | 4.20 | -4.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.92 | 15.62 | -16.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHC.DE | IUSN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.56 | 2.19 | -2.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 0.53 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
ETHC.DE vs. IUSN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHC.DE drawdown since its inception was -64.71%, which is greater than IUSN.DE's maximum drawdown of -40.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHC.DE and IUSN.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHC.DE | IUSN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.71% | -40.23% | -24.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.46% | -7.12% | -54.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.71% | -24.32% | -40.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.46% | 0.00% | -61.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.30% | -7.03% | -16.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.26% | 1.92% | +34.34% |
Volatility
ETHC.DE vs. IUSN.DE - Volatility Comparison
21Shares Ethereum Core Staking ETP (ETHC.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.10% compared to iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (IUSN.DE) at 3.46%. This indicates that ETHC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUSN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHC.DE | IUSN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.10% | 3.46% | +6.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.36% | 9.56% | +32.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.70% | 13.64% | +46.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.52% | 16.53% | +43.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.52% | 18.31% | +42.21% |
ETHC.DE vs. IUSN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHC.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than IUSN.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHC.DE vs. IUSN.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ETHC.DE nor IUSN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHC.DE and IUSN.DE have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ETHC.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ETHC.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IUSN.DE.
ETHC.DE is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while IUSN.DE is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: 21Shares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for ETHC.DE and 0.35% for IUSN.DE.
Find the right allocation for ETHC.DE and IUSN.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer