ETHC.DE vs. ETLR.DE
ETHC.DE (21Shares Ethereum Core Staking ETP) and ETLR.DE (L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHC.DE is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by 21Shares, while ETLR.DE is a Japan Equities fund tracking the Solactive Core Japan Large & Mid Cap. ETHC.DE is actively managed, while ETLR.DE is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ETHC.DE returned -3.71%/yr vs 15.30%/yr for ETLR.DE. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.10% expense ratio.
Performance
ETHC.DE vs. ETLR.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHC.DE achieves a -39.39% return, which is significantly lower than ETLR.DE's 15.36% return.
ETHC.DE
- 1D
- -3.70%
- 1M
- -24.79%
- YTD
- -39.39%
- 6M
- -43.92%
- 1Y
- -33.47%
- 3Y*
- -3.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETLR.DE
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 5.92%
- YTD
- 15.36%
- 6M
- 15.53%
- 1Y
- 28.58%
- 3Y*
- 15.30%
- 5Y*
- 9.93%
- 10Y*
- —
ETHC.DE vs. ETLR.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETHC.DE 21Shares Ethereum Core Staking ETP | -39.39% | -21.50% | 52.05% | 90.66% | -17.54% |
ETLR.DE L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF | 15.36% | 12.36% | 14.84% | 16.06% | 1.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHC.DE and ETLR.DE is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2022 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHC.DE vs. ETLR.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ETHC.DE
ETLR.DE
ETHC.DE vs. ETLR.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 21Shares Ethereum Core Staking ETP (ETHC.DE) and L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (ETLR.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHC.DE | ETLR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.30 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | 2.74 | -3.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.92 | 8.92 | -9.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHC.DE | ETLR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.56 | 1.56 | -2.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 0.61 | -0.55 |
Drawdowns
ETHC.DE vs. ETLR.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHC.DE drawdown since its inception was -64.71%, which is greater than ETLR.DE's maximum drawdown of -27.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHC.DE and ETLR.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHC.DE | ETLR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.71% | -27.67% | -37.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.46% | -10.40% | -51.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.71% | -16.42% | -48.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.46% | -0.30% | -61.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.30% | -5.44% | -17.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.26% | 3.20% | +33.06% |
Volatility
ETHC.DE vs. ETLR.DE - Volatility Comparison
21Shares Ethereum Core Staking ETP (ETHC.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.10% compared to L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (ETLR.DE) at 3.19%. This indicates that ETHC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETLR.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHC.DE | ETLR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.10% | 3.19% | +6.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.36% | 14.63% | +27.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.70% | 18.30% | +41.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.52% | 16.32% | +44.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.52% | 16.84% | +43.68% |
ETHC.DE vs. ETLR.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ETHC.DE and ETLR.DE have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ETHC.DE vs. ETLR.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ETHC.DE nor ETLR.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHC.DE and ETLR.DE have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ETHC.DE and ETLR.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.
ETHC.DE is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while ETLR.DE is Japan Equities. They also come from different issuers: 21Shares and Legal & General.
Find the right allocation for ETHC.DE and ETLR.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer