ETGIX vs. IASMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Greater India Fund (ETGIX) and Guinness Atkinson Asia Focus Fund (IASMX).
ETGIX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on May 1, 1994. IASMX is managed by Guinness Atkinson. It was launched on Apr 28, 1996.
Performance
ETGIX vs. IASMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ETGIX vs. IASMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETGIX Eaton Vance Greater India Fund | -17.93% | -2.06% | 17.55% | 20.60% | -19.86% | 25.74% | 17.64% | 10.52% | -12.14% | 44.79% |
IASMX Guinness Atkinson Asia Focus Fund | -1.19% | 29.64% | 4.38% | 5.95% | -28.04% | -6.46% | 26.02% | 29.32% | -17.58% | 47.12% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETGIX achieves a -17.93% return, which is significantly lower than IASMX's -1.19% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ETGIX having a 7.25% annualized return and IASMX not far ahead at 7.59%.
ETGIX
- 1D
- -2.02%
- 1M
- -13.94%
- YTD
- -17.93%
- 6M
- -15.49%
- 1Y
- -14.36%
- 3Y*
- 6.00%
- 5Y*
- 2.18%
- 10Y*
- 7.25%
IASMX
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -8.38%
- YTD
- -1.19%
- 6M
- -2.18%
- 1Y
- 26.03%
- 3Y*
- 9.95%
- 5Y*
- -1.62%
- 10Y*
- 7.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ETGIX vs. IASMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETGIX has a 1.57% expense ratio, which is lower than IASMX's 1.98% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ETGIX vs. IASMX — Risk / Return Rank
ETGIX
IASMX
ETGIX vs. IASMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Greater India Fund (ETGIX) and Guinness Atkinson Asia Focus Fund (IASMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETGIX | IASMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.01 | 1.26 | -2.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.35 | 1.80 | -3.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.25 | -0.41 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | 1.49 | -2.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -2.19 | 6.38 | -8.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETGIX | IASMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.01 | 1.26 | -2.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | -0.08 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.37 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.16 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between ETGIX and IASMX is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ETGIX vs. IASMX - Dividend Comparison
ETGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.63%, more than IASMX's 7.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETGIX Eaton Vance Greater India Fund | 17.63% | 14.47% | 4.07% | 4.85% | 21.62% | 8.60% | 0.24% | 2.79% | 1.17% | 3.32% | 0.56% | 0.79% |
IASMX Guinness Atkinson Asia Focus Fund | 7.01% | 6.92% | 1.51% | 1.16% | 3.40% | 9.14% | 5.78% | 6.61% | 12.82% | 0.90% | 1.44% | 1.18% |
Drawdowns
ETGIX vs. IASMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETGIX drawdown since its inception was -73.62%, roughly equal to the maximum IASMX drawdown of -76.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETGIX and IASMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETGIX | IASMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.62% | -76.53% | +2.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.03% | -15.27% | -6.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.84% | -49.08% | +19.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.71% | -52.51% | +9.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.22% | -18.06% | -9.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.89% | -33.36% | +6.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.71% | 3.57% | +3.14% |
Volatility
ETGIX vs. IASMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance Greater India Fund (ETGIX) is 5.74%, while Guinness Atkinson Asia Focus Fund (IASMX) has a volatility of 6.81%. This indicates that ETGIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IASMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ETGIX | IASMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.74% | 6.81% | -1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.79% | 12.32% | -2.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.21% | 20.10% | -5.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.01% | 21.22% | -6.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.55% | 20.61% | -3.06% |