PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETGAX vs. EISMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETGAX vs. EISMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Georgia Municipal Income Fund (ETGAX) and Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund (EISMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETGAX achieves a 2.01% return, which is significantly higher than EISMX's -2.06% return. Over the past 10 years, ETGAX has underperformed EISMX with an annualized return of 1.96%, while EISMX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.01% annualized return.


ETGAX

1D
0.12%
1M
1.27%
YTD
2.01%
6M
2.42%
1Y
7.62%
3Y*
4.20%
5Y*
1.32%
10Y*
1.96%

EISMX

1D
1.60%
1M
0.73%
YTD
-2.06%
6M
-3.58%
1Y
-4.95%
3Y*
7.10%
5Y*
3.68%
10Y*
10.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETGAX vs. EISMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ETGAX
Eaton Vance Georgia Municipal Income Fund
2.01%5.10%1.87%5.64%-7.83%0.78%4.69%6.54%1.50%3.60%
EISMX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund
-2.06%-5.66%17.64%14.01%-8.77%22.02%11.31%34.37%-5.55%24.71%

Correlation

The correlation between ETGAX and EISMX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2002

-0.00

The correlation between ETGAX and EISMX shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (all time) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETGAX vs. EISMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETGAX
ETGAX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ETGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
ETGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

EISMX
EISMX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
EISMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EISMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
EISMX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
EISMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
EISMX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETGAX vs. EISMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Georgia Municipal Income Fund (ETGAX) and Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund (EISMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ETGAXEISMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.74

0.96

+0.79

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

-0.37

+3.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.65

-0.69

+10.34

ETGAX vs. EISMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETGAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is higher than the EISMX Sharpe Ratio of -0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETGAX and EISMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ETGAX vs. EISMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETGAX drawdown since its inception was -27.12%, smaller than the maximum EISMX drawdown of -45.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETGAX and EISMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETGAXEISMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.12%

-45.32%

+18.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.79%

-14.66%

+11.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.77%

-19.39%

+13.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.27%

-19.81%

+7.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.27%

-39.95%

+27.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-12.94%

+12.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.29%

-5.84%

+3.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

7.87%

-7.08%

Volatility

ETGAX vs. EISMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Georgia Municipal Income Fund (ETGAX) is 0.78%, while Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund (EISMX) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that ETGAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EISMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETGAXEISMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.78%

4.49%

-3.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.16%

11.61%

-9.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.86%

15.58%

-12.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.78%

17.15%

-13.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.79%

18.84%

-15.05%

ETGAX vs. EISMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETGAX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than EISMX's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETGAX vs. EISMX - Dividend Comparison

ETGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, less than EISMX's 6.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EISMX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund
6.56%6.43%7.26%2.78%10.37%10.49%9.80%6.52%7.20%3.30%3.58%6.70%
ETGAX
Eaton Vance Georgia Municipal Income Fund
3.29%4.02%3.60%2.68%2.01%1.57%2.04%2.91%2.90%2.95%3.06%3.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


ETGAX and EISMX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EISMX has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to ETGAX (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETGAX dropped -27.12% vs EISMX's -45.32%.

ETGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETGAX and EISMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer