ETEGX vs. FAMFX
ETEGX (Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund) and FAMFX (FAM Small Cap Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, ETEGX returned 9.00%/yr vs 6.85%/yr for FAMFX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ETEGX charges 1.21%/yr vs 1.27%/yr for FAMFX.
Performance
ETEGX vs. FAMFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETEGX achieves a 5.31% return, which is significantly higher than FAMFX's -5.96% return. Over the past 10 years, ETEGX has outperformed FAMFX with an annualized return of 9.00%, while FAMFX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.85% annualized return.
ETEGX
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 3.84%
- YTD
- 5.31%
- 6M
- 2.85%
- 1Y
- 1.22%
- 3Y*
- 6.30%
- 5Y*
- 2.48%
- 10Y*
- 9.00%
FAMFX
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 1.67%
- YTD
- -5.96%
- 6M
- -8.17%
- 1Y
- -15.04%
- 3Y*
- 1.39%
- 5Y*
- 0.99%
- 10Y*
- 6.85%
ETEGX vs. FAMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETEGX Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund | 5.31% | -6.20% | 14.65% | 11.28% | -15.52% | 21.45% | 12.73% | 27.57% | -6.00% | 14.87% |
FAMFX FAM Small Cap Fund | -5.96% | -11.60% | 12.43% | 20.10% | -12.42% | 27.72% | 10.10% | 26.89% | -8.54% | 4.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETEGX and FAMFX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2012 | 0.89 |
The correlation between ETEGX and FAMFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.92 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETEGX vs. FAMFX — Risk / Return Rank
ETEGX
FAMFX
ETEGX vs. FAMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund (ETEGX) and FAM Small Cap Fund (FAMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ETEGX | FAMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 0.88 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | -0.63 | +0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.36 | -1.13 | +1.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ETEGX vs. FAMFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETEGX drawdown since its inception was -67.58%, which is greater than FAMFX's maximum drawdown of -39.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETEGX and FAMFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETEGX | FAMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.58% | -39.66% | -27.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.05% | -22.23% | +9.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.98% | -28.71% | +8.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.30% | -28.71% | +4.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.66% | -39.66% | +3.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.01% | -23.58% | +16.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.73% | -6.01% | -16.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.90% | 12.35% | -6.45% |
Volatility
ETEGX vs. FAMFX - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund (ETEGX) and FAM Small Cap Fund (FAMFX) have volatilities of 4.55% and 4.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETEGX | FAMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.55% | 4.35% | +0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.40% | 12.98% | -1.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.25% | 17.58% | -1.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.79% | 18.76% | +0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.83% | 19.52% | +0.31% |
ETEGX vs. FAMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETEGX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is lower than FAMFX's 1.27% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETEGX vs. FAMFX - Dividend Comparison
ETEGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.81%, more than FAMFX's 3.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETEGX Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund | 7.81% | 8.23% | 5.13% | 0.68% | 3.22% | 13.87% | 1.06% | 7.19% | 12.29% | 11.02% | 13.88% | 23.25% |
FAMFX FAM Small Cap Fund | 3.63% | 3.41% | 4.43% | 6.44% | 0.36% | 6.55% | 0.00% | 0.47% | 10.85% | 2.15% | 2.99% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETEGX and FAMFX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETEGX has higher volatility (4.55%) compared to FAMFX (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETEGX dropped -67.58% vs FAMFX's -39.66%.
ETEGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.13 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETEGX and FAMFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer