PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETEC vs. SBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETEC vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Breakthrough Environmental Solutions ETF (ETEC) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETEC achieves a 5.73% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 39.44% return.


ETEC

1D
-0.29%
1M
-9.96%
6M
-0.42%
YTD
5.73%
1Y
25.22%
3Y*
1.23%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.96%

SBIT

1D
5.60%
1M
-6.04%
6M
32.41%
YTD
39.44%
1Y
98.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-42.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$15.42K$21.23K$24.41K
$29.57M$32.71M$46.48M

ETEC vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ETEC
iShares Breakthrough Environmental Solutions ETF
5.73%31.89%-11.38%
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
39.44%-25.11%-73.74%

Correlation

The correlation between ETEC and SBIT is -0.41, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

-0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETEC vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ETEC
ETEC Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
ETEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETEC Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
ETEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETEC Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

SBIT
SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ETEC vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Breakthrough Environmental Solutions ETF (ETEC) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ETECSBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.23

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

2.35

-1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.30

5.19

-0.88

ETEC vs. SBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETEC Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is comparable to the SBIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETEC and SBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ETEC vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETEC drawdown since its inception was -39.71%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETEC and SBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETECSBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.71%

-91.35%

+51.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.95%

-47.94%

+27.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.05%

-77.87%

+59.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.78%

-69.07%

+54.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.77%

21.67%

-15.90%

Volatility

ETEC vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Breakthrough Environmental Solutions ETF (ETEC) is 8.56%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 18.09%. This indicates that ETEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETECSBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.56%

18.09%

-9.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.87%

67.10%

-46.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.97%

88.65%

-63.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.61%

96.10%

-71.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.61%

96.10%

-71.49%

ETEC vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETEC has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETEC vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison

ETEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than SBIT's 4.10% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
ETEC
iShares Breakthrough Environmental Solutions ETF
0.50%0.33%1.24%4.18%
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
4.03%0.52%1.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ETEC and SBIT have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBIT has higher volatility (18.09%) compared to ETEC (8.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETEC dropped -39.71% vs SBIT's -91.35%.

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 98.77% vs 25.22% for ETEC. On fees, ETEC is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, ETEC has been the lower-risk option at 8.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 98.77% return vs 25.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ETEC is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SBIT.

SBIT has the higher dividend yield at 4.03%, compared with 0.50% for ETEC.

ETEC is categorized as Technology Equities, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. ETEC tracks Morningstar Global Emerging Green Technologies Select Index - Benchmark TR Net, while SBIT tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for ETEC and 0.95% for SBIT.

SBIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETEC and SBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer