PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETC.TO vs. QQQT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ETC.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve Cryptocurrencies ETF (ETC.TO) and Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged (QQQT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ETC.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ETC.TO
Evolve Cryptocurrencies ETF
-23.10%-13.66%117.58%33.33%
QQQT.TO
Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged
-9.31%30.06%35.30%15.39%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETC.TO achieves a -23.10% return, which is significantly lower than QQQT.TO's -9.31% return.


ETC.TO

1D
2.26%
1M
5.54%
YTD
-23.10%
6M
-43.95%
1Y
-19.35%
3Y*
25.53%
5Y*
10Y*

QQQT.TO

1D
4.95%
1M
-5.64%
YTD
-9.31%
6M
-5.74%
1Y
34.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ETC.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETC.TO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQT.TO's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ETC.TO vs. QQQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETC.TO
ETC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
ETC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
ETC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQT.TO
QQQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QQQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETC.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Cryptocurrencies ETF (ETC.TO) and Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged (QQQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETC.TOQQQT.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.40

1.19

-1.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.28

1.87

-2.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.27

-0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.38

1.98

-2.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.79

7.25

-8.05

ETC.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETC.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is lower than the QQQT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETC.TO and QQQT.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETC.TOQQQT.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.40

1.19

-1.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.96

-0.84

Correlation

The correlation between ETC.TO and QQQT.TO is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ETC.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

ETC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, more than QQQT.TO's 0.25% yield.


TTM202520242023
ETC.TO
Evolve Cryptocurrencies ETF
0.76%0.58%0.05%0.00%
QQQT.TO
Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged
0.25%0.30%5.63%0.26%

Drawdowns

ETC.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETC.TO drawdown since its inception was -75.66%, which is greater than QQQT.TO's maximum drawdown of -30.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETC.TO and QQQT.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ETC.TOQQQT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.66%

-30.32%

-45.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.00%

-17.37%

-35.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.34%

-13.27%

-36.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.98%

-4.98%

-30.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.28%

4.75%

+20.53%

Volatility

ETC.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Volatility Comparison

Evolve Cryptocurrencies ETF (ETC.TO) has a higher volatility of 14.56% compared to Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged (QQQT.TO) at 9.11%. This indicates that ETC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ETC.TOQQQT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.56%

9.11%

+5.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.98%

17.31%

+22.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.96%

29.50%

+19.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.80%

26.40%

+28.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.80%

26.40%

+28.40%