ETC-USD vs. BMNR
Compare and contrast key facts about Ethereum Classic (ETC-USD) and Bitmine Immersion Technologies Inc (BMNR).
Performance
ETC-USD vs. BMNR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ETC-USD vs. BMNR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ETC-USD Ethereum Classic | -29.17% | -29.84% |
BMNR Bitmine Immersion Technologies Inc | -27.48% | 250.43% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETC-USD achieves a -29.17% return, which is significantly lower than BMNR's -27.48% return.
ETC-USD
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- -7.00%
- YTD
- -29.17%
- 6M
- -58.56%
- 1Y
- -52.04%
- 3Y*
- -26.52%
- 5Y*
- -11.89%
- 10Y*
- —
BMNR
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -3.48%
- YTD
- -27.48%
- 6M
- -62.38%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETC-USD vs. BMNR — Risk / Return Rank
ETC-USD
BMNR
ETC-USD vs. BMNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ethereum Classic (ETC-USD) and Bitmine Immersion Technologies Inc (BMNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETC-USD | BMNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.86 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.14 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.74 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETC-USD | BMNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.27 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between ETC-USD and BMNR is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Drawdowns
ETC-USD vs. BMNR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETC-USD drawdown since its inception was -94.39%, which is greater than BMNR's maximum drawdown of -87.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETC-USD and BMNR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETC-USD | BMNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.39% | -87.11% | -7.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.25% | -85.41% | -8.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.29% | -67.75% | -5.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.48% | — | — |
Volatility
ETC-USD vs. BMNR - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ETC-USD | BMNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.68% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.10% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.26% | 793.13% | -729.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 85.60% | 793.13% | -707.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 130.98% | 793.13% | -662.15% |