ESTX.AX vs. WRLD.AX
ESTX.AX (Global X EURO STOXX 50 ETF) and WRLD.AX (Betashares Managed Risk Global Shares Complex ETF) are both Global Equities funds. ESTX.AX is passively managed, while WRLD.AX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESTX.AX returned 12.14%/yr vs 10.33%/yr for WRLD.AX. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
ESTX.AX vs. WRLD.AX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESTX.AX achieves a 3.22% return, which is significantly lower than WRLD.AX's 4.57% return.
ESTX.AX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- 6M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- 3.22%
- 1Y
- 8.95%
- 3Y*
- 14.83%
- 5Y*
- 12.14%
- 10Y*
- —
WRLD.AX
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 2.32%
- 6M
- 3.52%
- YTD
- 4.57%
- 1Y
- 13.29%
- 3Y*
- 16.18%
- 5Y*
- 10.33%
- 10Y*
- 10.04%
ESTX.AX vs. WRLD.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESTX.AX Global X EURO STOXX 50 ETF | 3.22% | 27.21% | 13.48% | 23.32% | -7.46% | 18.99% | -2.51% | 27.06% | -8.09% | 15.99% |
WRLD.AX Betashares Managed Risk Global Shares Complex ETF | 4.57% | 9.59% | 29.10% | 13.20% | -10.32% | 23.66% | -3.31% | 22.48% | -0.50% | 10.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESTX.AX and WRLD.AX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2016 | 0.53 |
The correlation between ESTX.AX and WRLD.AX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESTX.AX vs. WRLD.AX — Risk / Return Rank
ESTX.AX
WRLD.AX
ESTX.AX vs. WRLD.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X EURO STOXX 50 ETF (ESTX.AX) and Betashares Managed Risk Global Shares Complex ETF (WRLD.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESTX.AX | WRLD.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.26 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.71 | 1.41 | -0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.05 | 4.01 | -1.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESTX.AX vs. WRLD.AX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESTX.AX drawdown since its inception was -29.33%, which is greater than WRLD.AX's maximum drawdown of -16.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESTX.AX and WRLD.AX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESTX.AX | WRLD.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.33% | -16.14% | -13.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.48% | -9.22% | -5.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.48% | -13.70% | -0.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.60% | -14.47% | -12.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -16.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.65% | -0.50% | -2.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.29% | -4.19% | -1.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.06% | 3.26% | +1.80% |
Volatility
ESTX.AX vs. WRLD.AX - Volatility Comparison
Global X EURO STOXX 50 ETF (ESTX.AX) has a higher volatility of 3.11% compared to Betashares Managed Risk Global Shares Complex ETF (WRLD.AX) at 1.76%. This indicates that ESTX.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WRLD.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESTX.AX | WRLD.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.11% | 1.76% | +1.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.59% | 6.83% | +6.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.76% | 8.86% | +6.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.35% | 11.35% | +5.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.23% | 11.00% | +5.23% |
Dividends
ESTX.AX vs. WRLD.AX - Dividend Comparison
ESTX.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.25%, while WRLD.AX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESTX.AX Global X EURO STOXX 50 ETF | 7.25% | 1.79% | 4.19% | 3.67% | 3.90% | 1.60% | 2.15% | 2.79% | 4.16% | 1.15% | 0.15% |
WRLD.AX Betashares Managed Risk Global Shares Complex ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 4.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.66% | 0.90% | 0.00% | 0.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESTX.AX and WRLD.AX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and BetaShares.
Find the right allocation for ESTX.AX and WRLD.AX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer