PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESRI.DE vs. XEMD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESRI.DE vs. XEMD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Emerging SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF USD Acc (ESRI.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D (XEMD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ESRI.DE is traded in USD, while XEMD.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XEMD.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESRI.DE achieves a 15.11% return, which is significantly lower than XEMD.DE's 26.59% return.


ESRI.DE

1D
-1.32%
1M
3.40%
YTD
15.11%
6M
17.12%
1Y
29.56%
3Y*
14.68%
5Y*
3.52%
10Y*

XEMD.DE

1D
-1.47%
1M
5.29%
YTD
26.59%
6M
28.79%
1Y
52.13%
3Y*
24.09%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESRI.DE vs. XEMD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ESRI.DE
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Emerging SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF USD Acc
15.11%25.41%0.66%4.70%-15.68%-4.38%
XEMD.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D
26.59%33.96%7.34%9.02%-19.54%-3.79%

Correlation

The correlation between ESRI.DE and XEMD.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2021

0.92

The correlation between ESRI.DE and XEMD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESRI.DE vs. XEMD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESRI.DE
ESRI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
ESRI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESRI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESRI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
ESRI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESRI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

XEMD.DE
XEMD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XEMD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEMD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEMD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
XEMD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEMD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESRI.DE vs. XEMD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Emerging SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF USD Acc (ESRI.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D (XEMD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESRI.DEXEMD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.49

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

3.99

-1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.03

14.79

-6.76

ESRI.DE vs. XEMD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESRI.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is lower than the XEMD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESRI.DE and XEMD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESRI.DEXEMD.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

2.73

-1.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.52

-0.09

Drawdowns

ESRI.DE vs. XEMD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESRI.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.02%, which is greater than XEMD.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESRI.DE and XEMD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESRI.DEXEMD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.02%

-33.52%

-8.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.38%

-13.02%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.72%

-17.95%

-1.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.41%

-2.69%

+0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.05%

-12.40%

-0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.67%

3.51%

+0.16%

Volatility

ESRI.DE vs. XEMD.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Emerging SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF USD Acc (ESRI.DE) is 6.75%, while Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D (XEMD.DE) has a volatility of 7.85%. This indicates that ESRI.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEMD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESRI.DEXEMD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.75%

7.85%

-1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.51%

16.38%

-0.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.78%

19.04%

-1.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.84%

18.83%

-1.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.78%

18.83%

-0.05%

ESRI.DE vs. XEMD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESRI.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XEMD.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESRI.DE vs. XEMD.DE - Dividend Comparison

ESRI.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XEMD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
ESRI.DE
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Emerging SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XEMD.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D
1.55%1.92%3.01%2.38%2.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, ESRI.DE and XEMD.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XEMD.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XEMD.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ESRI.DE.

ESRI.DE tracks MSCI Emerging SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped, while XEMD.DE tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ESRI.DE and 0.18% for XEMD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESRI.DE and XEMD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer