ESPO.L vs. XNNS.L
ESPO.L (VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD) and XNNS.L (Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C) are both Technology Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, from VanEck and DWS respectively. Both are passively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESPO.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XNNS.L.
Performance
ESPO.L vs. XNNS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ESPO.L is traded in USD, while XNNS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XNNS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
ESPO.L
- 1D
- -1.96%
- 1M
- -1.47%
- YTD
- -13.69%
- 6M
- -16.29%
- 1Y
- -12.37%
- 3Y*
- 19.90%
- 5Y*
- 6.61%
- 10Y*
- —
XNNS.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESPO.L vs. XNNS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPO.L VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD | -13.69% | 27.34% | 48.69% | 33.19% | -12.97% |
XNNS.L Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C | -7.38% | 14.28% | 22.03% | 33.40% | -11.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESPO.L and XNNS.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2022 | 0.75 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ESPO.L and XNNS.L has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESPO.L vs. XNNS.L — Risk / Return Rank
ESPO.L
XNNS.L
ESPO.L vs. XNNS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD (ESPO.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNNS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESPO.L | XNNS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.38 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.69 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESPO.L | XNNS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | — | — |
Drawdowns
ESPO.L vs. XNNS.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESPO.L | XNNS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.32% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.28% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.10% | — | — |
Volatility
ESPO.L vs. XNNS.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESPO.L | XNNS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.82% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.92% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.01% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.14% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.60% | — | — |
ESPO.L vs. XNNS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESPO.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than XNNS.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESPO.L vs. XNNS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ESPO.L nor XNNS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ESPO.L and XNNS.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XNNS.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XNNS.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ESPO.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ESPO.L and 0.35% for XNNS.L.
Find the right allocation for ESPO.L and XNNS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer