PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESPO.L vs. VPNG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESPO.L vs. VPNG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD (ESPO.L) and Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VPNG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ESPO.L is traded in USD, while VPNG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VPNG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESPO.L achieves a -13.69% return, which is significantly lower than VPNG.L's 50.42% return.


ESPO.L

1D
-1.96%
1M
-1.47%
YTD
-13.69%
6M
-16.29%
1Y
-12.37%
3Y*
19.90%
5Y*
6.61%
10Y*

VPNG.L

1D
-1.89%
1M
6.24%
YTD
50.42%
6M
49.82%
1Y
78.01%
3Y*
35.22%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESPO.L vs. VPNG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ESPO.L
VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD
-13.69%27.34%48.69%33.19%-34.90%-3.41%
VPNG.L
Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
50.42%29.76%13.28%17.15%-30.25%3.96%

Correlation

The correlation between ESPO.L and VPNG.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2021

0.58

The correlation between ESPO.L and VPNG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESPO.L vs. VPNG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESPO.L
ESPO.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
ESPO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESPO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESPO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
ESPO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESPO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

VPNG.L
VPNG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
VPNG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPNG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPNG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
VPNG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPNG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESPO.L vs. VPNG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD (ESPO.L) and Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VPNG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESPO.LVPNG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.55

-0.63

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.38

5.64

-6.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.69

19.03

-19.72

ESPO.L vs. VPNG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESPO.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.58, which is lower than the VPNG.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESPO.L and VPNG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESPO.LVPNG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.58

3.41

-3.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.66

+0.03

Drawdowns

ESPO.L vs. VPNG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESPO.L drawdown since its inception was -50.84%, which is greater than VPNG.L's maximum drawdown of -38.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESPO.L and VPNG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESPO.LVPNG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.84%

-38.84%

-12.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.42%

-14.17%

-13.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.42%

-25.68%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.32%

-1.89%

-23.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.28%

-14.89%

-1.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.10%

4.20%

+10.90%

Volatility

ESPO.L vs. VPNG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD (ESPO.L) is 4.82%, while Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VPNG.L) has a volatility of 7.46%. This indicates that ESPO.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VPNG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESPO.LVPNG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.82%

7.46%

-2.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.92%

17.70%

-3.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.01%

23.53%

-5.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.14%

22.79%

+1.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.60%

22.79%

+1.81%

ESPO.L vs. VPNG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESPO.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than VPNG.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESPO.L vs. VPNG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ESPO.L nor VPNG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ESPO.L and VPNG.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VPNG.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VPNG.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ESPO.L.

ESPO.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while VPNG.L tracks Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure v2 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ESPO.L and 0.50% for VPNG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESPO.L and VPNG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer