ESPO.L vs. DRVG.L
ESPO.L (VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD) and DRVG.L (Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing) are both Technology Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, from VanEck and Global X respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ESPO.L returned 19.90%/yr vs 20.62%/yr for DRVG.L. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESPO.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DRVG.L.
Performance
ESPO.L vs. DRVG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ESPO.L is traded in USD, while DRVG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the DRVG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESPO.L achieves a -13.69% return, which is significantly lower than DRVG.L's 39.58% return.
ESPO.L
- 1D
- -1.96%
- 1M
- -1.47%
- YTD
- -13.69%
- 6M
- -16.29%
- 1Y
- -12.37%
- 3Y*
- 19.90%
- 5Y*
- 6.61%
- 10Y*
- —
DRVG.L
- 1D
- -1.63%
- 1M
- 6.14%
- YTD
- 39.58%
- 6M
- 37.80%
- 1Y
- 86.84%
- 3Y*
- 20.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESPO.L vs. DRVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPO.L VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD | -13.69% | 27.34% | 48.69% | 33.19% | -34.90% | -9.62% |
DRVG.L Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 39.58% | 29.52% | -5.72% | 25.91% | -34.38% | -3.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESPO.L and DRVG.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2021 | 0.69 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ESPO.L and DRVG.L has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
ESPO.L vs. DRVG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESPO.L
DRVG.L
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
ESPO.L
DRVG.L
Communication Services
ESPO.L
DRVG.L
Consumer Cyclical
ESPO.L
DRVG.L
Basic Materials
ESPO.L
-
DRVG.L
Consumer Defensive
ESPO.L
-
DRVG.L
-
Energy
ESPO.L
-
DRVG.L
-
Financial Services
ESPO.L
-
DRVG.L
-
Healthcare
ESPO.L
-
DRVG.L
-
Industrials
ESPO.L
-
DRVG.L
Real Estate
ESPO.L
-
DRVG.L
-
Utilities
ESPO.L
-
DRVG.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESPO.L vs. DRVG.L — Risk / Return Rank
ESPO.L
DRVG.L
ESPO.L vs. DRVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD (ESPO.L) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing (DRVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESPO.L | DRVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.56 | -0.64 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.38 | 7.03 | -7.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.69 | 21.97 | -22.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESPO.L | DRVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.58 | 3.65 | -4.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.26 | +0.43 |
Drawdowns
ESPO.L vs. DRVG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESPO.L drawdown since its inception was -50.84%, which is greater than DRVG.L's maximum drawdown of -42.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESPO.L and DRVG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESPO.L | DRVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.84% | -42.84% | -8.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.42% | -12.42% | -15.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.42% | -34.61% | +7.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.32% | -2.46% | -22.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.28% | -21.45% | +5.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.10% | 3.98% | +11.12% |
Volatility
ESPO.L vs. DRVG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD (ESPO.L) is 4.82%, while Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing (DRVG.L) has a volatility of 9.55%. This indicates that ESPO.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESPO.L | DRVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.82% | 9.55% | -4.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.92% | 17.68% | -3.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.01% | 23.90% | -5.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.14% | 27.24% | -3.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.60% | 27.24% | -2.64% |
ESPO.L vs. DRVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESPO.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than DRVG.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESPO.L vs. DRVG.L - Dividend Comparison
ESPO.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DRVG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRVG.L Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 0.44% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
ESPO.L VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESPO.L and DRVG.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DRVG.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DRVG.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ESPO.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ESPO.L and 0.50% for DRVG.L.
Find the right allocation for ESPO.L and DRVG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer