ESPAX vs. PVCMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Allspring Special Small Cap Value Fund (ESPAX) and Palm Valley Capital Fund Investor Class (PVCMX).
ESPAX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on May 7, 1993. PVCMX is managed by Palm Valley. It was launched on Apr 30, 2019.
Performance
ESPAX vs. PVCMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ESPAX vs. PVCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPAX Allspring Special Small Cap Value Fund | -1.86% | -3.10% | 6.44% | 18.65% | -13.94% | 27.61% | 1.16% | 11.04% |
PVCMX Palm Valley Capital Fund Investor Class | 0.58% | 4.45% | 4.24% | 9.47% | 3.17% | 3.72% | 19.13% | 1.22% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESPAX achieves a -1.86% return, which is significantly lower than PVCMX's 0.58% return.
ESPAX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -8.61%
- YTD
- -1.86%
- 6M
- -0.56%
- 1Y
- 1.56%
- 3Y*
- 5.23%
- 5Y*
- 2.01%
- 10Y*
- 7.26%
PVCMX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -1.05%
- YTD
- 0.58%
- 6M
- 1.23%
- 1Y
- 4.45%
- 3Y*
- 5.18%
- 5Y*
- 4.37%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ESPAX vs. PVCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESPAX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is lower than PVCMX's 1.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ESPAX vs. PVCMX — Risk / Return Rank
ESPAX
PVCMX
ESPAX vs. PVCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Special Small Cap Value Fund (ESPAX) and Palm Valley Capital Fund Investor Class (PVCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESPAX | PVCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.08 | 0.92 | -0.84 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.28 | 1.44 | -1.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.17 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.01 | 1.52 | -1.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.04 | 4.20 | -4.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESPAX | PVCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 | 0.92 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.84 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 1.04 | -0.62 |
Correlation
The correlation between ESPAX and PVCMX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ESPAX vs. PVCMX - Dividend Comparison
ESPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.41%, more than PVCMX's 4.77% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPAX Allspring Special Small Cap Value Fund | 8.41% | 8.26% | 10.10% | 2.07% | 6.24% | 6.34% | 0.39% | 1.68% | 7.90% | 5.33% | 2.25% | 2.33% |
PVCMX Palm Valley Capital Fund Investor Class | 4.77% | 4.80% | 6.95% | 4.84% | 2.30% | 1.98% | 2.70% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ESPAX vs. PVCMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESPAX drawdown since its inception was -61.14%, which is greater than PVCMX's maximum drawdown of -7.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESPAX and PVCMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESPAX | PVCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.14% | -7.44% | -53.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.80% | -2.81% | -10.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.84% | -7.44% | -19.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.69% | -1.85% | -10.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.17% | -1.29% | -7.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.15% | 1.02% | +4.13% |
Volatility
ESPAX vs. PVCMX - Volatility Comparison
Allspring Special Small Cap Value Fund (ESPAX) has a higher volatility of 5.65% compared to Palm Valley Capital Fund Investor Class (PVCMX) at 0.95%. This indicates that ESPAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PVCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ESPAX | PVCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.65% | 0.95% | +4.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.34% | 2.94% | +9.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.82% | 4.75% | +17.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.18% | 5.20% | +14.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.34% | 6.37% | +14.97% |