ESP0.DE vs. QUTM.DE
ESP0.DE (VanEck Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF) and QUTM.DE (VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc) are both Technology Equities funds from VanEck - ESP0.DE tracks the MarketVector Global Video Gaming and eSports ESG while QUTM.DE tracks the MarketVector™ Global Quantum Leaders Total Return Net Index (MVQTMLTR). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ESP0.DE returned -13.94% vs 59.20% for QUTM.DE. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.55% expense ratio.
Performance
ESP0.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESP0.DE achieves a -13.12% return, which is significantly lower than QUTM.DE's 33.86% return.
ESP0.DE
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- YTD
- -13.12%
- 6M
- -16.53%
- 1Y
- -13.94%
- 3Y*
- 16.64%
- 5Y*
- 7.55%
- 10Y*
- —
QUTM.DE
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- 18.24%
- YTD
- 33.86%
- 6M
- 29.29%
- 1Y
- 59.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESP0.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ESP0.DE VanEck Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF | -13.12% | 1.82% |
QUTM.DE VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc | 33.86% | 14.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESP0.DE and QUTM.DE is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2025 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESP0.DE vs. QUTM.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ESP0.DE
QUTM.DE
ESP0.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF (ESP0.DE) and VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESP0.DE | QUTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.32 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | 2.48 | -3.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.93 | 5.81 | -6.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESP0.DE | QUTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.81 | 1.95 | -2.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 1.71 | -1.00 |
Drawdowns
ESP0.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESP0.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.11%, which is greater than QUTM.DE's maximum drawdown of -23.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESP0.DE and QUTM.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESP0.DE | QUTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.11% | -23.74% | -16.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.09% | -23.74% | -2.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.82% | -3.42% | -21.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.75% | -7.71% | -5.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.94% | 10.15% | +4.79% |
Volatility
ESP0.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF (ESP0.DE) is 4.55%, while VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE) has a volatility of 12.36%. This indicates that ESP0.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QUTM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESP0.DE | QUTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.55% | 12.36% | -7.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.06% | 20.92% | -7.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.18% | 30.14% | -12.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.48% | 30.16% | -7.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.16% | 30.16% | -7.00% |
ESP0.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ESP0.DE and QUTM.DE have an expense ratio of 0.55%.
Dividends
ESP0.DE vs. QUTM.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ESP0.DE nor QUTM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ESP0.DE and QUTM.DE have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.55% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESP0.DE and QUTM.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.55% per year.
ESP0.DE tracks MarketVector Global Video Gaming and eSports ESG, while QUTM.DE tracks MarketVector™ Global Quantum Leaders Total Return Net Index (MVQTMLTR).
Find the right allocation for ESP0.DE and QUTM.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer