PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESNT vs. NTB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ESNT vs. NTB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Essent Group Ltd. (ESNT) and The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESNT achieves a -8.24% return, which is significantly lower than NTB's 20.10% return.


ESNT

1D
0.82%
1M
-2.45%
YTD
-8.24%
6M
-9.44%
1Y
1.15%
3Y*
12.20%
5Y*
7.25%
10Y*
12.75%

NTB

1D
0.27%
1M
4.87%
YTD
20.10%
6M
17.53%
1Y
44.04%
3Y*
36.73%
5Y*
15.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESNT vs. NTB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ESNT
Essent Group Ltd.
-8.24%21.95%5.23%38.60%-12.76%7.06%-15.53%53.00%-21.28%34.14%
NTB
The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited
20.10%42.51%20.23%14.28%-17.47%28.34%-10.09%24.14%-10.70%19.79%

Correlation

The correlation between ESNT and NTB is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016

0.51

The correlation between ESNT and NTB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ESNT:

$5.57B

NTB:

$2.40B

EPS

ESNT:

$6.98

NTB:

$5.78

PE Ratio

ESNT:

8.45

NTB:

10.16

PEG Ratio

ESNT:

1.95

NTB:

0.68

PS Ratio

ESNT:

4.48

NTB:

3.23

PB Ratio

ESNT:

0.98

NTB:

2.11

Total Revenue (TTM)

ESNT:

$1.29B

NTB:

$757.47M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ESNT:

$839.13M

NTB:

$613.13M

EBITDA (TTM)

ESNT:

$643.27M

NTB:

$263.27M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESNT vs. NTB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESNT
ESNT Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
ESNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESNT Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
ESNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESNT Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

NTB
NTB Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
NTB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTB Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
NTB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTB Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESNT vs. NTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Essent Group Ltd. (ESNT) and The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESNTNTBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.37

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.07

3.87

-3.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.15

12.13

-11.98

ESNT vs. NTB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESNT Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is lower than the NTB Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESNT and NTB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESNT vs. NTB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESNT drawdown since its inception was -64.72%, smaller than the maximum NTB drawdown of -69.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESNT and NTB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESNTNTBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.72%

-69.74%

+5.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.41%

-11.44%

-3.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.36%

-21.89%

+3.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.79%

-39.96%

+11.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.73%

-0.63%

-10.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.74%

-18.65%

+4.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.59%

3.64%

+3.95%

Volatility

ESNT vs. NTB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Essent Group Ltd. (ESNT) is 6.24%, while The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) has a volatility of 7.02%. This indicates that ESNT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NTB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESNTNTBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.24%

7.02%

-0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.65%

13.58%

+4.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.58%

20.16%

+2.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.96%

28.70%

-3.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.71%

34.67%

+4.04%

Dividends

ESNT vs. NTB - Dividend Comparison

ESNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, less than NTB's 3.40% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ESNT
Essent Group Ltd.
2.24%1.91%2.06%1.90%2.21%1.54%1.48%0.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NTB
The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited
3.40%3.77%4.82%5.50%5.90%4.62%5.65%4.75%4.85%3.53%0.32%

Financials

ESNT vs. NTB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Essent Group Ltd. and The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M20222023202420252026
336.07M
155.90M
(ESNT) Total Revenue
(NTB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ESNT vs. NTB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Essent Group Ltd. and The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
99.1%
Portfolio components
ESNT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Essent Group Ltd. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 336.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

NTB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited reported a gross profit of 154.50M and revenue of 155.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 99.1%.

ESNT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Essent Group Ltd. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 336.07M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

NTB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited reported an operating income of 64.00M and revenue of 155.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 41.1%.

ESNT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Essent Group Ltd. reported a net income of 171.80M and revenue of 336.07M, resulting in a net margin of 51.1%.

NTB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son Limited reported a net income of 62.60M and revenue of 155.90M, resulting in a net margin of 40.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ESNT and NTB have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NTB has higher volatility (7.02%) compared to ESNT (6.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESNT dropped -64.72% vs NTB's -69.74%.

NTB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESNT and NTB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer