PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESMAX vs. CAEZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESMAX vs. CAEZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco EQV European Small Company Fund (ESMAX) and Columbia Acorn European Fund (CAEZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESMAX achieves a 17.38% return, which is significantly higher than CAEZX's 6.63% return. Over the past 10 years, ESMAX has outperformed CAEZX with an annualized return of 9.49%, while CAEZX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.55% annualized return.


ESMAX

1D
1.10%
1M
3.52%
YTD
17.38%
6M
17.06%
1Y
18.87%
3Y*
16.43%
5Y*
8.23%
10Y*
9.49%

CAEZX

1D
0.38%
1M
3.11%
YTD
6.63%
6M
9.77%
1Y
13.25%
3Y*
10.36%
5Y*
1.68%
10Y*
8.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESMAX vs. CAEZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ESMAX
Invesco EQV European Small Company Fund
17.38%22.15%2.60%14.26%-16.30%24.30%9.63%15.37%-15.29%28.30%
CAEZX
Columbia Acorn European Fund
6.63%24.00%-4.20%25.11%-38.02%21.76%23.09%46.34%-18.57%38.37%

Correlation

The correlation between ESMAX and CAEZX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2011

0.81

The correlation between ESMAX and CAEZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESMAX vs. CAEZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESMAX
ESMAX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
ESMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
ESMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

CAEZX
CAEZX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
CAEZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAEZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAEZX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
CAEZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAEZX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESMAX vs. CAEZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EQV European Small Company Fund (ESMAX) and Columbia Acorn European Fund (CAEZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESMAXCAEZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.15

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

0.85

+0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.25

3.10

+1.14

ESMAX vs. CAEZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESMAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is higher than the CAEZX Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESMAX and CAEZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESMAXCAEZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.03

0.76

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.08

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.41

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.47

+0.16

Drawdowns

ESMAX vs. CAEZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESMAX drawdown since its inception was -65.90%, which is greater than CAEZX's maximum drawdown of -50.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESMAX and CAEZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESMAXCAEZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.90%

-50.98%

-14.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.45%

-14.38%

+1.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.80%

-22.96%

+7.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.92%

-50.98%

+18.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.83%

-50.98%

+11.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-5.31%

+4.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.93%

-11.52%

-2.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.17%

3.92%

+0.25%

Volatility

ESMAX vs. CAEZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco EQV European Small Company Fund (ESMAX) is 5.18%, while Columbia Acorn European Fund (CAEZX) has a volatility of 5.56%. This indicates that ESMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAEZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESMAXCAEZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.18%

5.56%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.05%

13.38%

+0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.23%

15.97%

+1.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.11%

21.80%

-6.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.69%

20.90%

-6.21%

ESMAX vs. CAEZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESMAX has a 1.48% expense ratio, which is higher than CAEZX's 1.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESMAX vs. CAEZX - Dividend Comparison

ESMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.87%, more than CAEZX's 19.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAEZX
Columbia Acorn European Fund
19.66%20.97%2.67%0.84%0.00%0.40%0.45%1.04%0.77%1.26%1.10%1.57%
ESMAX
Invesco EQV European Small Company Fund
29.87%35.06%9.96%4.94%11.28%3.24%2.75%7.01%6.27%3.21%2.07%5.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESMAX and CAEZX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CAEZX has higher volatility (5.56%) compared to ESMAX (5.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESMAX dropped -65.90% vs CAEZX's -50.98%.

ESMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESMAX and CAEZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer