PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESMAX vs. AEDAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESMAX vs. AEDAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco EQV European Small Company Fund (ESMAX) and Invesco EQV European Equity Fund (AEDAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ESMAX having a 17.38% return and AEDAX slightly higher at 18.02%. Over the past 10 years, ESMAX has outperformed AEDAX with an annualized return of 9.49%, while AEDAX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.74% annualized return.


ESMAX

1D
1.10%
1M
3.52%
YTD
17.38%
6M
17.06%
1Y
18.87%
3Y*
16.43%
5Y*
8.23%
10Y*
9.49%

AEDAX

1D
1.27%
1M
8.53%
YTD
18.02%
6M
21.99%
1Y
28.94%
3Y*
16.44%
5Y*
6.48%
10Y*
6.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESMAX vs. AEDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ESMAX
Invesco EQV European Small Company Fund
17.38%22.15%2.60%14.26%-16.30%24.30%9.63%15.37%-15.29%28.30%
AEDAX
Invesco EQV European Equity Fund
18.02%23.92%-0.79%19.64%-21.77%14.22%-0.06%24.54%-18.86%26.90%

Correlation

The correlation between ESMAX and AEDAX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2000

0.86

The correlation between ESMAX and AEDAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESMAX vs. AEDAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESMAX
ESMAX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
ESMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
ESMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

AEDAX
AEDAX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
AEDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
AEDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESMAX vs. AEDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EQV European Small Company Fund (ESMAX) and Invesco EQV European Equity Fund (AEDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESMAXAEDAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.34

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

2.65

-1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.25

9.28

-5.03

ESMAX vs. AEDAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESMAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the AEDAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESMAX and AEDAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESMAXAEDAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.03

1.89

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.37

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.39

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.48

+0.16

Drawdowns

ESMAX vs. AEDAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESMAX drawdown since its inception was -65.90%, which is greater than AEDAX's maximum drawdown of -60.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESMAX and AEDAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESMAXAEDAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.90%

-60.46%

-5.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.45%

-10.59%

-1.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.80%

-15.80%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.92%

-38.81%

+5.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.83%

-40.03%

+0.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

0.00%

-0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.93%

-16.90%

+2.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.17%

3.01%

+1.16%

Volatility

ESMAX vs. AEDAX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco EQV European Small Company Fund (ESMAX) has a higher volatility of 5.18% compared to Invesco EQV European Equity Fund (AEDAX) at 4.81%. This indicates that ESMAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AEDAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESMAXAEDAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.18%

4.81%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.05%

11.93%

+2.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.23%

14.83%

+2.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.11%

17.68%

-2.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.69%

17.47%

-2.78%

ESMAX vs. AEDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESMAX has a 1.48% expense ratio, which is higher than AEDAX's 1.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESMAX vs. AEDAX - Dividend Comparison

ESMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.87%, more than AEDAX's 14.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AEDAX
Invesco EQV European Equity Fund
14.33%16.92%10.53%2.58%7.48%9.40%1.30%2.53%1.43%1.86%1.59%4.78%
ESMAX
Invesco EQV European Small Company Fund
29.87%35.06%9.96%4.94%11.28%3.24%2.75%7.01%6.27%3.21%2.07%5.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESMAX and AEDAX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ESMAX has higher volatility (5.18%) compared to AEDAX (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESMAX dropped -65.90% vs AEDAX's -60.46%.

AEDAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESMAX and AEDAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer