ESK vs. SETH
ESK (REX-Osprey ETH + Staking ETF) and SETH (ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. ESK is actively managed, while SETH is passively managed. Their -0.93 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. ESK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SETH.
Performance
ESK vs. SETH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ESK
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SETH
- 1D
- 3.07%
- 1M
- -9.89%
- 6M
- 19.58%
- YTD
- 29.72%
- 1Y
- 27.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -31.15%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.13M | $1.17M | $1.89M |
ESK vs. SETH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ESK REX-Osprey ETH + Staking ETF | -44.38% | -23.95% |
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF | 29.72% | 24.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESK and SETH is -0.93, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2025 | -0.93 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESK vs. SETH — Risk / Return Rank
ESK
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SETH
ESK vs. SETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX-Osprey ETH + Staking ETF (ESK) and ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESK | SETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.14 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.16 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.03 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESK vs. SETH - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESK | SETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -80.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -30.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -64.37% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -55.10% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 17.67% | — |
Volatility
ESK vs. SETH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESK | SETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.41% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 45.76% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 67.20% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 68.89% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 68.89% | — |
ESK vs. SETH - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than SETH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESK vs. SETH - Dividend Comparison
ESK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than SETH's 17.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ESK REX-Osprey ETH + Staking ETF | 1.06% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF | 17.06% | 7.01% | 3.44% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESK and SETH have a correlation of -0.93, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SETH.
SETH has the higher dividend yield at 17.06%, compared with 1.06% for ESK.
They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ESK and 0.95% for SETH.
Find the right allocation for ESK and SETH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer