ESK vs. BTCE.DE
ESK (REX-Osprey ETH + Staking ETF) and BTCE.DE (ETC Group Physical Bitcoin) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESK charges 0.75%/yr vs 2.00%/yr for BTCE.DE.
Performance
ESK vs. BTCE.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ESK is traded in USD, while BTCE.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the BTCE.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESK achieves a -39.23% return, which is significantly lower than BTCE.DE's -25.06% return.
ESK
- 1D
- -6.26%
- 1M
- -24.17%
- YTD
- -39.23%
- 6M
- -42.40%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCE.DE
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- -16.74%
- YTD
- -25.06%
- 6M
- -29.16%
- 1Y
- -39.09%
- 3Y*
- 32.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.19%
- 10Y*
- —
ESK vs. BTCE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ESK REX-Osprey ETH + Staking ETF | -39.23% | -23.15% |
BTCE.DE ETC Group Physical Bitcoin | -25.06% | -21.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESK and BTCE.DE is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESK vs. BTCE.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ESK
BTCE.DE
ESK vs. BTCE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX-Osprey ETH + Staking ETF (ESK) and ETC Group Physical Bitcoin (BTCE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESK | BTCE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.98 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.99 | 0.60 | -1.60 |
Drawdowns
ESK vs. BTCE.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESK drawdown since its inception was -61.14%, smaller than the maximum BTCE.DE drawdown of -77.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESK and BTCE.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESK | BTCE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.14% | -77.07% | +15.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -49.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -49.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -77.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.14% | -47.76% | -13.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.19% | -31.23% | -8.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 28.46% | — |
Volatility
ESK vs. BTCE.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESK | BTCE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.60% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 31.13% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.24% | 39.93% | +27.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.24% | 53.26% | +13.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.24% | 58.58% | +8.66% |
ESK vs. BTCE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCE.DE's 2.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESK vs. BTCE.DE - Dividend Comparison
ESK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, while BTCE.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BTCE.DE ETC Group Physical Bitcoin | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ESK REX-Osprey ETH + Staking ETF | 0.97% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESK and BTCE.DE have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 2.00% for BTCE.DE.
They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and ETC Issuance. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ESK and 2.00% for BTCE.DE.
Find the right allocation for ESK and BTCE.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer