ESK vs. BLKC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ESK (REX-Osprey ETH + Staking ETF) and BLKC (Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. ESK is actively managed, while BLKC is passively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for BLKC.

Performance

ESK vs. BLKC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX-Osprey ETH + Staking ETF (ESK) and Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF (BLKC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ESK

• 1D: -6.26%
• 1M: -24.17%
• YTD: -39.23%
• 6M: -42.40%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BLKC

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESK vs. BLKC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ESK REX-Osprey ETH + Staking ETF	-39.23%	-23.15%
BLKC Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF	-12.03%	-13.84%

Correlation

The correlation between ESK and BLKC is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025	0.68

Return for Risk

ESK vs. BLKC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX-Osprey ETH + Staking ETF (ESK) and Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF (BLKC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ESK	BLKC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.99	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	ESK	BLKC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-61.14%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.19%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ESK	BLKC	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.24%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	67.24%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	67.24%	—	—

ESK vs. BLKC - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BLKC's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

ESK vs. BLKC - Dividend Comparison

ESK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than BLKC's 4.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BLKC Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF	4.39%	7.72%	19.66%	1.92%	5.40%	0.51%
ESK REX-Osprey ETH + Staking ETF	0.97%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ESK and BLKC in my portfolio?

ESK and BLKC have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ESK or BLKC?

On fees, BLKC is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ESK or BLKC?

BLKC is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ESK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ESK or BLKC?

BLKC has the higher dividend yield at 4.39%, compared with 0.97% for ESK.

What is the main difference between ESK and BLKC?

They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ESK and 0.60% for BLKC.