ESIT.L vs. QWTM.L
ESIT.L (iShares MSCI Europe Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF) and QWTM.L (WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF - USD Acc) are both Technology Equities funds - ESIT.L tracks the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD while QWTM.L tracks the WisdomTree Classiq Quantum Computing UCITS Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESIT.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for QWTM.L.
Performance
ESIT.L vs. QWTM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ESIT.L is traded in GBP, while QWTM.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the QWTM.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESIT.L achieves a 51.10% return, which is significantly lower than QWTM.L's 54.42% return.
ESIT.L
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 23.02%
- YTD
- 51.10%
- 6M
- 49.13%
- 1Y
- 68.29%
- 3Y*
- 24.63%
- 5Y*
- 15.12%
- 10Y*
- —
QWTM.L
- 1D
- -2.39%
- 1M
- 27.41%
- YTD
- 54.42%
- 6M
- 52.73%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESIT.L vs. QWTM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ESIT.L iShares MSCI Europe Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF | 51.10% | 19.49% |
QWTM.L WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 54.42% | 19.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESIT.L and QWTM.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2025 | 0.65 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESIT.L vs. QWTM.L — Risk / Return Rank
ESIT.L
QWTM.L
ESIT.L vs. QWTM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (ESIT.L) and WisdomTree Quantum Computing UCITS ETF - USD Acc (QWTM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESIT.L | QWTM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.80 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.60 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESIT.L | QWTM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 3.28 | -2.56 |
Drawdowns
ESIT.L vs. QWTM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESIT.L drawdown since its inception was -37.50%, which is greater than QWTM.L's maximum drawdown of -23.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIT.L and QWTM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESIT.L | QWTM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.50% | -23.74% | -13.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.34% | -2.39% | +2.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.53% | -10.24% | -1.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.66% | — | — |
Volatility
ESIT.L vs. QWTM.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESIT.L | QWTM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.46% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.86% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.50% | 39.20% | -14.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.01% | 39.20% | -14.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.65% | 39.20% | -14.55% |
ESIT.L vs. QWTM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESIT.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than QWTM.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESIT.L vs. QWTM.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ESIT.L nor QWTM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ESIT.L and QWTM.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESIT.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESIT.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for QWTM.L.
ESIT.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while QWTM.L tracks WisdomTree Classiq Quantum Computing UCITS Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ESIT.L and 0.50% for QWTM.L.
Find the right allocation for ESIT.L and QWTM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer