ESIT.L vs. KLWD.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ESIT.L (iShares MSCI Europe Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF) and KLWD.L (WisdomTree Cloud Computing UCITS ETF - USD Acc) are both Technology Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, from iShares and WisdomTree respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ESIT.L returned 68.29% vs -7.63% for KLWD.L. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ESIT.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for KLWD.L.

Performance

ESIT.L vs. KLWD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Europe Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (ESIT.L) and WisdomTree Cloud Computing UCITS ETF - USD Acc (KLWD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ESIT.L is traded in GBP, while KLWD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the KLWD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESIT.L achieves a 51.10% return, which is significantly higher than KLWD.L's -5.67% return.

ESIT.L

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 23.02%
• YTD: 51.10%
• 6M: 49.13%
• 1Y: 68.29%
• 3Y*: 24.63%
• 5Y*: 15.12%
• 10Y*: —

KLWD.L

• 1D: -2.99%
• 1M: 18.10%
• YTD: -5.67%
• 6M: -4.57%
• 1Y: -7.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESIT.L vs. KLWD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ESIT.L iShares MSCI Europe Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF	51.10%	20.30%
KLWD.L WisdomTree Cloud Computing UCITS ETF - USD Acc	-5.67%	8.16%

Correlation

The correlation between ESIT.L and KLWD.L is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025	0.32

ESIT.L vs. KLWD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ESIT.L	KLWD.L
Technology	92.0%	97.3%
Communication Services	5.3%	-
Industrials	2.7%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	2.8%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

ESIT.L vs. KLWD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESIT.L

ESIT.L Risk / Return Rank: 82
ESIT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
ESIT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
ESIT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 75
ESIT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
ESIT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77

KLWD.L

KLWD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7
KLWD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
KLWD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
KLWD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7
KLWD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
KLWD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESIT.L vs. KLWD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (ESIT.L) and WisdomTree Cloud Computing UCITS ETF - USD Acc (KLWD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ESIT.L	KLWD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.78	-0.22	+3.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.66	-0.08	+3.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	0.99	+0.46
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.80	-0.22	+6.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.60	-0.52	+15.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ESIT.L vs. KLWD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESIT.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.78, which is higher than the KLWD.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESIT.L and KLWD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ESIT.L	KLWD.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.78	-0.22	+3.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.72	0.05	+0.66

Drawdowns

ESIT.L vs. KLWD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESIT.L drawdown since its inception was -37.50%, which is greater than KLWD.L's maximum drawdown of -35.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIT.L and KLWD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESIT.L	KLWD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.50%	-35.51%	-1.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.71%	-34.77%	+23.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.34%	-10.71%	+10.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.53%	-11.11%	-0.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.66%	14.63%	-9.97%

Volatility

ESIT.L vs. KLWD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Europe Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (ESIT.L) is 9.46%, while WisdomTree Cloud Computing UCITS ETF - USD Acc (KLWD.L) has a volatility of 15.82%. This indicates that ESIT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KLWD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ESIT.L	KLWD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.46%	15.82%	-6.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.86%	30.90%	-11.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.50%	34.46%	-9.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.01%	33.83%	-8.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.65%	33.83%	-9.18%

ESIT.L vs. KLWD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESIT.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than KLWD.L's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

ESIT.L vs. KLWD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ESIT.L nor KLWD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ESIT.L and KLWD.L in my portfolio?

ESIT.L and KLWD.L have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ESIT.L or KLWD.L?

On fees, ESIT.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ESIT.L or KLWD.L?

ESIT.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for KLWD.L.

What is the main difference between ESIT.L and KLWD.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ESIT.L and 0.40% for KLWD.L.