ESIN.L vs. XLBS.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ESIN.L (iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc) and XLBS.L (Invesco Materials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) are both Industrials Equities funds - ESIN.L tracks the MSCI World/Materials NR USD while XLBS.L tracks the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Materials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESIN.L returned 13.02%/yr vs 6.06%/yr for XLBS.L. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESIN.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLBS.L.

Performance

ESIN.L vs. XLBS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ESIN.L) and Invesco Materials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLBS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ESIN.L is traded in GBP, while XLBS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XLBS.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESIN.L achieves a 7.95% return, which is significantly lower than XLBS.L's 12.95% return.

ESIN.L

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: 0.61%
• YTD: 7.95%
• 6M: 10.12%
• 1Y: 18.56%
• 3Y*: 19.65%
• 5Y*: 13.02%
• 10Y*: —

XLBS.L

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 1.69%
• YTD: 12.95%
• 6M: 15.79%
• 1Y: 19.92%
• 3Y*: 8.32%
• 5Y*: 6.06%
• 10Y*: 10.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESIN.L vs. XLBS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ESIN.L iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc	7.95%	31.04%	9.74%	24.40%	-11.34%	9.01%
XLBS.L Invesco Materials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc	12.95%	3.23%	0.89%	6.66%	-1.62%	9.55%

Correlation

The correlation between ESIN.L and XLBS.L is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021	0.57

The correlation between ESIN.L and XLBS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ESIN.L vs. XLBS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ESIN.L	XLBS.L
Industrials	96.1%	1.6%
Communication Services	2.2%	-
Financial Services	1.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	1.1%	8.6%
Consumer Defensive	0.4%	-
Technology	0.3%	-
Basic Materials	0.3%	89.8%
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

ESIN.L vs. XLBS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESIN.L

ESIN.L Risk / Return Rank: 29
ESIN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
ESIN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
ESIN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 29
ESIN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
ESIN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 32

XLBS.L

XLBS.L Risk / Return Rank: 32
XLBS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
XLBS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
XLBS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 30
XLBS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
XLBS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESIN.L vs. XLBS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ESIN.L) and Invesco Materials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLBS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ESIN.L	XLBS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.99	1.24	-0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.55	1.76	-0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.22	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.31	1.80	-0.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.64	6.29	-1.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ESIN.L vs. XLBS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESIN.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is comparable to the XLBS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESIN.L and XLBS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ESIN.L	XLBS.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99	1.24	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	0.35	+0.36
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.56	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.72	0.58	+0.14

Drawdowns

ESIN.L vs. XLBS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESIN.L drawdown since its inception was -24.82%, smaller than the maximum XLBS.L drawdown of -29.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIN.L and XLBS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESIN.L	XLBS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.82%	-29.14%	+4.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.11%	-11.04%	-3.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.55%	-22.11%	+5.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.82%	-22.11%	-2.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-29.14%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.57%	-3.10%	-0.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.41%	-5.53%	+0.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.99%	3.16%	+0.83%

Volatility

ESIN.L vs. XLBS.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ESIN.L) has a higher volatility of 6.24% compared to Invesco Materials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLBS.L) at 5.78%. This indicates that ESIN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLBS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ESIN.L	XLBS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.24%	5.78%	+0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.70%	13.17%	+2.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.73%	16.06%	+2.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.41%	17.40%	+1.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.36%	18.92%	-0.56%

ESIN.L vs. XLBS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESIN.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than XLBS.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ESIN.L vs. XLBS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ESIN.L nor XLBS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ESIN.L and XLBS.L in my portfolio?

ESIN.L and XLBS.L have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ESIN.L or XLBS.L?

On fees, XLBS.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ESIN.L or XLBS.L?

XLBS.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for ESIN.L.

What is the main difference between ESIN.L and XLBS.L?

ESIN.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while XLBS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Materials Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ESIN.L and 0.14% for XLBS.L.