ESIN.L vs. WENS.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ESIN.L (iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc) and WENS.L (iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - ESIN.L is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while WENS.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ESIN.L returned 19.65%/yr vs 13.87%/yr for WENS.L. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ESIN.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for WENS.L.

Performance

ESIN.L vs. WENS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ESIN.L) and iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WENS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESIN.L achieves a 7.95% return, which is significantly lower than WENS.L's 31.38% return.

ESIN.L

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: 0.61%
• YTD: 7.95%
• 6M: 10.12%
• 1Y: 18.56%
• 3Y*: 19.65%
• 5Y*: 13.02%
• 10Y*: —

WENS.L

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: -0.63%
• YTD: 31.38%
• 6M: 26.68%
• 1Y: 44.00%
• 3Y*: 13.87%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESIN.L vs. WENS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ESIN.L iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc	7.95%	31.04%	9.74%	24.40%	14.50%
WENS.L iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	31.38%	3.24%	2.09%	-2.00%	17.73%

Correlation

The correlation between ESIN.L and WENS.L is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.23
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2022	0.11

The correlation between ESIN.L and WENS.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ESIN.L vs. WENS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESIN.L

ESIN.L Risk / Return Rank: 29
ESIN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
ESIN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
ESIN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 29
ESIN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
ESIN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 32

WENS.L

WENS.L Risk / Return Rank: 59
WENS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
WENS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
WENS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 62
WENS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
WENS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESIN.L vs. WENS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ESIN.L) and iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WENS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ESIN.L	WENS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.99	2.06	-1.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.55	2.54	-0.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.37	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.31	2.99	-1.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.64	9.66	-5.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ESIN.L vs. WENS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESIN.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is lower than the WENS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESIN.L and WENS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ESIN.L	WENS.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99	2.06	-1.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.72	0.59	+0.13

Drawdowns

ESIN.L vs. WENS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESIN.L drawdown since its inception was -24.82%, which is greater than WENS.L's maximum drawdown of -22.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIN.L and WENS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESIN.L	WENS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.82%	-22.49%	-2.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.11%	-14.63%	+0.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.55%	-22.49%	+5.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.57%	-7.62%	+4.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.41%	-9.15%	+3.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.99%	4.54%	-0.55%

Volatility

ESIN.L vs. WENS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ESIN.L) is 6.24%, while iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WENS.L) has a volatility of 7.96%. This indicates that ESIN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WENS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ESIN.L	WENS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.24%	7.96%	-1.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.70%	18.19%	-2.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.73%	21.33%	-2.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.41%	21.49%	-3.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.36%	21.49%	-3.13%

ESIN.L vs. WENS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESIN.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than WENS.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ESIN.L vs. WENS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ESIN.L nor WENS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
ESIN.L iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WENS.L iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	0.00%	0.00%	1.75%	3.61%	1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ESIN.L and WENS.L in my portfolio?

ESIN.L and WENS.L have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ESIN.L or WENS.L?

On fees, ESIN.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ESIN.L or WENS.L?

ESIN.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for WENS.L.

What is the main difference between ESIN.L and WENS.L?

ESIN.L is categorized as Industrials Equities, while WENS.L is Energy Equities. ESIN.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while WENS.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ESIN.L and 0.25% for WENS.L.