ESIN.L vs. SPEQ.L
ESIN.L (iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc) and SPEQ.L (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - ESIN.L is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while SPEQ.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Net Total Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESIN.L returned 13.02%/yr vs 9.42%/yr for SPEQ.L. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESIN.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SPEQ.L.
Performance
ESIN.L vs. SPEQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ESIN.L is traded in GBP, while SPEQ.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPEQ.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESIN.L achieves a 7.95% return, which is significantly lower than SPEQ.L's 9.84% return.
ESIN.L
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- 7.95%
- 6M
- 10.12%
- 1Y
- 18.56%
- 3Y*
- 19.65%
- 5Y*
- 13.02%
- 10Y*
- —
SPEQ.L
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 4.71%
- YTD
- 9.84%
- 6M
- 9.91%
- 1Y
- 21.00%
- 3Y*
- 12.33%
- 5Y*
- 9.42%
- 10Y*
- —
ESIN.L vs. SPEQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESIN.L iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc | 7.95% | 31.04% | 9.74% | 24.40% | -11.34% | 9.01% |
SPEQ.L Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc | 9.84% | 3.57% | 14.19% | 7.75% | -0.69% | 14.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESIN.L and SPEQ.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021 | 0.51 |
The correlation between ESIN.L and SPEQ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
ESIN.L vs. SPEQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESIN.L
SPEQ.L
Industrials
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
ESIN.L
SPEQ.L
Communication Services
ESIN.L
SPEQ.L
Financial Services
ESIN.L
SPEQ.L
Consumer Cyclical
ESIN.L
SPEQ.L
Consumer Defensive
ESIN.L
SPEQ.L
Technology
ESIN.L
SPEQ.L
Basic Materials
ESIN.L
SPEQ.L
Energy
ESIN.L
-
SPEQ.L
Healthcare
ESIN.L
-
SPEQ.L
Real Estate
ESIN.L
-
SPEQ.L
Utilities
ESIN.L
-
SPEQ.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESIN.L vs. SPEQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
ESIN.L
SPEQ.L
ESIN.L vs. SPEQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ESIN.L) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (SPEQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESIN.L | SPEQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.34 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | 3.64 | -2.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.64 | 11.69 | -7.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESIN.L | SPEQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 1.89 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.66 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.79 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
ESIN.L vs. SPEQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESIN.L drawdown since its inception was -24.82%, which is greater than SPEQ.L's maximum drawdown of -20.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIN.L and SPEQ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESIN.L | SPEQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.82% | -20.28% | -4.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.11% | -5.75% | -8.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.55% | -20.28% | +3.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.82% | -20.28% | -4.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.57% | 0.00% | -3.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.41% | -4.39% | -1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.99% | 1.79% | +2.20% |
Volatility
ESIN.L vs. SPEQ.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ESIN.L) has a higher volatility of 6.24% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (SPEQ.L) at 2.74%. This indicates that ESIN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPEQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESIN.L | SPEQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.24% | 2.74% | +3.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.70% | 7.98% | +7.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.73% | 11.07% | +7.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.41% | 16.07% | +2.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.36% | 16.89% | +1.47% |
ESIN.L vs. SPEQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESIN.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than SPEQ.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ESIN.L vs. SPEQ.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ESIN.L nor SPEQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ESIN.L and SPEQ.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESIN.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESIN.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SPEQ.L.
ESIN.L is categorized as Industrials Equities, while SPEQ.L is S&P 500. ESIN.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while SPEQ.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Net Total Return. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ESIN.L and 0.20% for SPEQ.L.
Find the right allocation for ESIN.L and SPEQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer