PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESIN.L vs. IITU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESIN.L vs. IITU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ESIN.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ESIN.L is traded in GBP, while IITU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IITU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESIN.L achieves a 7.95% return, which is significantly lower than IITU.L's 23.25% return.


ESIN.L

1D
0.70%
1M
0.61%
YTD
7.95%
6M
10.12%
1Y
18.56%
3Y*
19.65%
5Y*
13.02%
10Y*

IITU.L

1D
-2.08%
1M
14.24%
YTD
23.25%
6M
22.00%
1Y
53.38%
3Y*
30.94%
5Y*
25.50%
10Y*
27.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESIN.L vs. IITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ESIN.L
iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc
7.95%31.04%9.74%24.40%-11.34%9.01%
IITU.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
23.25%14.44%40.85%50.70%-20.63%31.84%

Correlation

The correlation between ESIN.L and IITU.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021

0.52

The correlation between ESIN.L and IITU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

ESIN.L vs. IITU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESIN.L
IITU.L

Industrials

96.1%
0.0%

Communication Services

2.2%

-

Financial Services

1.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.4%

-

Technology

0.3%
99.6%

Basic Materials

0.3%

-

Energy

-

0.1%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Industrials

ESIN.L
96.1%
IITU.L
0.0%

Communication Services

ESIN.L
2.2%
IITU.L

-

Financial Services

ESIN.L
1.3%
IITU.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

ESIN.L
1.1%
IITU.L

-

Consumer Defensive

ESIN.L
0.4%
IITU.L

-

Technology

ESIN.L
0.3%
IITU.L
99.6%

Basic Materials

ESIN.L
0.3%
IITU.L

-

Energy

ESIN.L

-

IITU.L
0.1%

Healthcare

ESIN.L

-

IITU.L

-

Real Estate

ESIN.L

-

IITU.L

-

Utilities

ESIN.L

-

IITU.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESIN.L vs. IITU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESIN.L
ESIN.L Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
ESIN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESIN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESIN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
ESIN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESIN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

IITU.L
IITU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IITU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IITU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
IITU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IITU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
IITU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESIN.L vs. IITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ESIN.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESIN.LIITU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.44

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

3.17

-1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.64

8.17

-3.53

ESIN.L vs. IITU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESIN.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is lower than the IITU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESIN.L and IITU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESIN.LIITU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

2.71

-1.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

1.16

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

1.23

-0.51

Drawdowns

ESIN.L vs. IITU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESIN.L drawdown since its inception was -24.82%, smaller than the maximum IITU.L drawdown of -28.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIN.L and IITU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESIN.LIITU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.82%

-28.03%

+3.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.11%

-16.76%

+2.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.55%

-28.03%

+11.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.82%

-28.03%

+3.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.57%

-2.89%

-0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.41%

-5.14%

-0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.99%

6.51%

-2.52%

Volatility

ESIN.L vs. IITU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ESIN.L) is 6.24%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) has a volatility of 7.01%. This indicates that ESIN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IITU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESIN.LIITU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.24%

7.01%

-0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.70%

14.45%

+1.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.73%

19.60%

-0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.41%

21.94%

-3.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.36%

21.31%

-2.95%

ESIN.L vs. IITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESIN.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than IITU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ESIN.L vs. IITU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ESIN.L nor IITU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ESIN.L and IITU.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IITU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IITU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for ESIN.L.

ESIN.L is categorized as Industrials Equities, while IITU.L is Technology Equities. ESIN.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ESIN.L and 0.15% for IITU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESIN.L and IITU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer