ESIN.L vs. CSP1.L
ESIN.L (iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc) and CSP1.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESIN.L is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while CSP1.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESIN.L returned 13.02%/yr vs 14.94%/yr for CSP1.L. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESIN.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CSP1.L.
Performance
ESIN.L vs. CSP1.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ESIN.L is traded in GBP, while CSP1.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CSP1.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESIN.L achieves a 7.95% return, which is significantly lower than CSP1.L's 10.55% return.
ESIN.L
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- 7.95%
- 6M
- 10.12%
- 1Y
- 18.56%
- 3Y*
- 19.65%
- 5Y*
- 13.02%
- 10Y*
- —
CSP1.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 5.54%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 10.48%
- 1Y
- 29.13%
- 3Y*
- 19.02%
- 5Y*
- 14.94%
- 10Y*
- 16.07%
ESIN.L vs. CSP1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESIN.L iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc | 7.95% | 31.04% | 9.74% | 24.40% | -11.34% | 9.01% |
CSP1.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.55% | 9.37% | 27.35% | 19.79% | -9.05% | 20.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESIN.L and CSP1.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021 | 0.60 |
The correlation between ESIN.L and CSP1.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
ESIN.L vs. CSP1.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESIN.L
CSP1.L
Industrials
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
ESIN.L
CSP1.L
Communication Services
ESIN.L
CSP1.L
Financial Services
ESIN.L
CSP1.L
Consumer Cyclical
ESIN.L
CSP1.L
Consumer Defensive
ESIN.L
CSP1.L
Technology
ESIN.L
CSP1.L
Basic Materials
ESIN.L
CSP1.L
Energy
ESIN.L
-
CSP1.L
Healthcare
ESIN.L
-
CSP1.L
Real Estate
ESIN.L
-
CSP1.L
Utilities
ESIN.L
-
CSP1.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESIN.L vs. CSP1.L — Risk / Return Rank
ESIN.L
CSP1.L
ESIN.L vs. CSP1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ESIN.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESIN.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.51 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | 4.07 | -2.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.64 | 14.99 | -10.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESIN.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 2.73 | -1.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 1.04 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 1.09 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
ESIN.L vs. CSP1.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESIN.L drawdown since its inception was -24.82%, roughly equal to the maximum CSP1.L drawdown of -25.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIN.L and CSP1.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESIN.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.82% | -25.48% | +0.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.11% | -7.12% | -6.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.55% | -20.77% | +4.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.82% | -20.77% | -4.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.57% | -0.24% | -3.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.41% | -3.32% | -2.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.99% | 1.94% | +2.05% |
Volatility
ESIN.L vs. CSP1.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Europe Industrials Sector UCITS ETF EUR Acc (ESIN.L) has a higher volatility of 6.24% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) at 2.62%. This indicates that ESIN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSP1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESIN.L | CSP1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.24% | 2.62% | +3.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.70% | 7.16% | +8.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.73% | 10.62% | +8.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.41% | 14.31% | +4.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.36% | 15.57% | +2.79% |
ESIN.L vs. CSP1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESIN.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than CSP1.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ESIN.L vs. CSP1.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ESIN.L nor CSP1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ESIN.L and CSP1.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSP1.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSP1.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for ESIN.L.
ESIN.L is categorized as Industrials Equities, while CSP1.L is S&P 500. ESIN.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while CSP1.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ESIN.L and 0.07% for CSP1.L.
Find the right allocation for ESIN.L and CSP1.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer