PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESIGX vs. PDEZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESIGX vs. PDEZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity ESG Fund (ESIGX) and PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund (PDEZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESIGX achieves a 26.17% return, which is significantly lower than PDEZX's 27.81% return.


ESIGX

1D
-4.42%
1M
2.64%
YTD
26.17%
6M
27.55%
1Y
51.63%
3Y*
22.45%
5Y*
6.00%
10Y*

PDEZX

1D
-6.85%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
27.81%
6M
28.79%
1Y
36.89%
3Y*
25.15%
5Y*
0.38%
10Y*
11.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESIGX vs. PDEZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ESIGX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity ESG Fund
26.17%34.35%7.96%10.61%-27.17%-1.02%45.70%
PDEZX
PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund
27.81%14.88%18.48%16.12%-41.65%-0.86%71.66%

Correlation

The correlation between ESIGX and PDEZX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2020

0.83

The correlation between ESIGX and PDEZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESIGX vs. PDEZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESIGX
ESIGX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
ESIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
ESIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

PDEZX
PDEZX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
PDEZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDEZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDEZX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
PDEZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDEZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESIGX vs. PDEZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity ESG Fund (ESIGX) and PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund (PDEZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESIGXPDEZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.29

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.18

2.92

+1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.53

9.46

+6.07

ESIGX vs. PDEZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESIGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is higher than the PDEZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESIGX and PDEZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESIGX vs. PDEZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESIGX drawdown since its inception was -47.21%, smaller than the maximum PDEZX drawdown of -54.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIGX and PDEZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESIGXPDEZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.21%

-54.95%

+7.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.34%

-13.94%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.59%

-21.92%

+1.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.76%

-52.88%

+8.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.42%

-6.85%

+2.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.67%

-20.15%

+0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.58%

4.29%

-0.71%

Volatility

ESIGX vs. PDEZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity ESG Fund (ESIGX) is 10.27%, while PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund (PDEZX) has a volatility of 14.55%. This indicates that ESIGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDEZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESIGXPDEZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.27%

14.55%

-4.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.49%

24.03%

-6.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.01%

26.93%

-6.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.34%

24.27%

-4.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.94%

22.61%

-0.67%

ESIGX vs. PDEZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESIGX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than PDEZX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESIGX vs. PDEZX - Dividend Comparison

ESIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than PDEZX's 1.73% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
ESIGX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity ESG Fund
1.38%2.04%0.51%0.78%0.00%16.52%0.61%
PDEZX
PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund
1.73%2.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESIGX and PDEZX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDEZX has higher volatility (14.55%) compared to ESIGX (10.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESIGX dropped -47.21% vs PDEZX's -54.95%.

ESIGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESIGX and PDEZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer