ESIF.L vs. VAPX.L
ESIF.L (iShares MSCI Europe Financials Sector UCITS ETF) and VAPX.L (Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing) are both exchange-traded funds - ESIF.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while VAPX.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESIF.L returned 22.76%/yr vs 10.98%/yr for VAPX.L. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESIF.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for VAPX.L.
Performance
ESIF.L vs. VAPX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESIF.L achieves a 11.73% return, which is significantly lower than VAPX.L's 35.34% return.
ESIF.L
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 4.72%
- 6M
- 11.47%
- YTD
- 11.73%
- 1Y
- 33.36%
- 3Y*
- 32.14%
- 5Y*
- 22.76%
- 10Y*
- —
VAPX.L
- 1D
- -2.32%
- 1M
- -10.95%
- 6M
- 28.36%
- YTD
- 35.34%
- 1Y
- 56.97%
- 3Y*
- 21.60%
- 5Y*
- 10.98%
- 10Y*
- 10.62%
ESIF.L vs. VAPX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESIF.L iShares MSCI Europe Financials Sector UCITS ETF | 11.73% | 54.50% | 20.18% | 18.73% | 3.59% | 20.48% | -8.68% |
VAPX.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing | 35.34% | 31.34% | -3.50% | 3.89% | -1.65% | 1.83% | 7.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESIF.L and VAPX.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2020 | 0.52 |
The correlation between ESIF.L and VAPX.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
ESIF.L vs. VAPX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESIF.L
VAPX.L
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
ESIF.L
VAPX.L
Technology
ESIF.L
VAPX.L
Industrials
ESIF.L
VAPX.L
Consumer Cyclical
ESIF.L
VAPX.L
Basic Materials
ESIF.L
-
VAPX.L
Communication Services
ESIF.L
-
VAPX.L
Consumer Defensive
ESIF.L
-
VAPX.L
Energy
ESIF.L
-
VAPX.L
Healthcare
ESIF.L
-
VAPX.L
Real Estate
ESIF.L
-
VAPX.L
Utilities
ESIF.L
-
VAPX.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESIF.L vs. VAPX.L — Risk / Return Rank
ESIF.L
VAPX.L
ESIF.L vs. VAPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Financials Sector UCITS ETF (ESIF.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESIF.L | VAPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.41 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.83 | 3.81 | -0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.86 | 12.19 | -2.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESIF.L vs. VAPX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESIF.L drawdown since its inception was -23.55%, smaller than the maximum VAPX.L drawdown of -30.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIF.L and VAPX.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESIF.L | VAPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.55% | -30.88% | +7.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.72% | -14.89% | +3.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.30% | -16.81% | +2.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.55% | -17.55% | -6.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.91% | -14.89% | +13.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.71% | -6.32% | +1.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | 4.66% | -1.28% |
Volatility
ESIF.L vs. VAPX.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Europe Financials Sector UCITS ETF (ESIF.L) is 4.11%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L) has a volatility of 14.28%. This indicates that ESIF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VAPX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESIF.L | VAPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.11% | 14.28% | -10.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.74% | 24.12% | -9.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.35% | 25.75% | -8.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.08% | 17.53% | +2.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.20% | 18.03% | +2.17% |
ESIF.L vs. VAPX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESIF.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VAPX.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ESIF.L vs. VAPX.L - Dividend Comparison
ESIF.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VAPX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESIF.L iShares MSCI Europe Financials Sector UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VAPX.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing | 2.04% | 2.70% | 3.47% | 3.53% | 4.32% | 3.51% | 2.08% | 3.39% | 3.52% | 3.10% | 2.71% | 3.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESIF.L and VAPX.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VAPX.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VAPX.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for ESIF.L.
ESIF.L is categorized as Financials Equities, while VAPX.L is Asia Pacific Equities. ESIF.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while VAPX.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ESIF.L and 0.15% for VAPX.L.
Find the right allocation for ESIF.L and VAPX.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer