ESIF.L vs. CB5.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ESIF.L (iShares MSCI Europe Financials Sector UCITS ETF) and CB5.L (Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Banks UCITS ETF) are both Financials Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD, from iShares and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ESIF.L returned 25.77% vs 44.85% for CB5.L. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ESIF.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for CB5.L.

Performance

ESIF.L vs. CB5.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Europe Financials Sector UCITS ETF (ESIF.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Banks UCITS ETF (CB5.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ESIF.L is traded in GBP, while CB5.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CB5.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESIF.L achieves a 3.13% return, which is significantly lower than CB5.L's 6.56% return.

ESIF.L

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: 3.69%
• YTD: 3.13%
• 6M: 9.24%
• 1Y: 25.77%
• 3Y*: 29.07%
• 5Y*: 19.63%
• 10Y*: —

CB5.L

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: 6.43%
• YTD: 6.56%
• 6M: 13.41%
• 1Y: 44.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESIF.L vs. CB5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ESIF.L iShares MSCI Europe Financials Sector UCITS ETF	3.13%	54.55%	5.56%
CB5.L Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Banks UCITS ETF	6.56%	83.78%	6.12%

Correlation

The correlation between ESIF.L and CB5.L is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2024	0.94

The correlation between ESIF.L and CB5.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

ESIF.L vs. CB5.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ESIF.L	CB5.L
Financial Services	96.9%	55.4%
Technology	1.0%	24.7%
Industrials	0.4%	15.3%
Consumer Cyclical	0.2%	2.3%
Basic Materials	-	2.2%
Communication Services	-	0.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.4%
Energy	-	1.8%
Healthcare	-	2.5%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	0.4%

Return for Risk

ESIF.L vs. CB5.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESIF.L

ESIF.L Risk / Return Rank: 44
ESIF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
ESIF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
ESIF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 42
ESIF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
ESIF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 47

CB5.L

CB5.L Risk / Return Rank: 60
CB5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
CB5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
CB5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 57
CB5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
CB5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESIF.L vs. CB5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Financials Sector UCITS ETF (ESIF.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Banks UCITS ETF (CB5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ESIF.L	CB5.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	2.09	-0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.13	2.81	-0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.35	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.20	2.94	-0.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.65	10.36	-2.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ESIF.L vs. CB5.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESIF.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the CB5.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESIF.L and CB5.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ESIF.L	CB5.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.50	2.09	-0.59
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.07	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.17	2.03	-0.86

Drawdowns

ESIF.L vs. CB5.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESIF.L drawdown since its inception was -23.55%, which is greater than CB5.L's maximum drawdown of -17.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIF.L and CB5.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESIF.L	CB5.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.55%	-17.55%	-6.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.68%	-15.17%	+3.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.26%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.84%	-1.20%	-0.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.12%	-2.47%	-1.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.36%	4.32%	-0.96%

Volatility

ESIF.L vs. CB5.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Europe Financials Sector UCITS ETF (ESIF.L) is 5.32%, while Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Banks UCITS ETF (CB5.L) has a volatility of 6.12%. This indicates that ESIF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CB5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ESIF.L	CB5.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.32%	6.12%	-0.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.15%	17.68%	-3.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.09%	21.41%	-4.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.32%	21.79%	-3.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.22%	21.79%	-3.57%

ESIF.L vs. CB5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESIF.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than CB5.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ESIF.L vs. CB5.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ESIF.L nor CB5.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ESIF.L and CB5.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, ESIF.L and CB5.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, ESIF.L or CB5.L?

On fees, ESIF.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ESIF.L or CB5.L?

ESIF.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CB5.L.

What is the main difference between ESIF.L and CB5.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Financials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ESIF.L and 0.25% for CB5.L.